Wednesday 12 December 2012

My relationship with Tinubu has not gotten worse or better- Jimi Agbaje



Do you remember the slogan: Jay-Kay OK? That was the slogan that sold Jimi Agbaje, a Pharmacist cum politician who sought election to govern Lagos State in 2007on the platform of the Democratic Peoples Alliance, (DPA). The founder of Jaykay Pharmacy Ltd, spoke with Opeyemi Adesina. Excerpts:

 Why have you suddenly gone underground politically?
It wouldn't be correct to say I have gone underground and let me just say that if you said, well during the campaign, yes I was quite prominent, that was to be expected. I think when campaigns or elections are near, there is always so much noise, I mean those who are running for office. So, you don't want to add your voice during that stage and is better to allow those who want to sell themselves to the public, you give them space and after elections then you can come back to begin to talk about national, regional, states and local government's issues. So, for me if you say during the run-up to the elections, yes, I was quite and that was deliberate. Let me assure the citizens or public that I'm still so much around.
You were rumoured at a point before the 2011 governorship election that you would be a replacement to Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola, what was the exact story?
Well, it was just a rumour and all those that cared to ask me at that time, I kept emphasizing that it was a rumour. There was nothing and I'm speaking very clearly that no such arrangements was ever in place and it was just a rumour.
Sir, were you ever contacted to come back to Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and be governorship candidate of ACN?
I was never contacted to be the governorship candidate of ACN and as to whether I was contacted to be a member of Action Congress of Nigeria, I think that is an on-going thing. Every party would want to attract membership. I mean every party will say look, why not come and join my party but there is nothing special to this invitation even when you have friends in one party or the other. But as to be the governorship candidate, let me say categorically “No.”
What is your present relationship with the leader of ACN, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu?
Normal, people tend to believe there is something wrong in the relationship. That you did not agree on issues does not affect the relationship, let me say that in 2007 when I left the party, it was based on my principle and it has nothing to do with personal relationship with Asiwaju. Our relationship, even then and till now remains very cordial and so people are just insinuating, let me assure you that there is no problem at all.
What is your own assessment of the governorship candidate of the ACN so far?
I think Lagosians spoke very clearly at the last elections, in terms of performance, in terms of acceptance on how he has performed in office, I think I align myself in that position.
But people tend to believe that the governor is not performing as expected like the first term in office?
Well, I can’t speak for him but it's interesting that only a few days ago, in the last one week, he conducted quite an extensive interview in one of the dailies, where he explained himself very clearly. I think one can say that to some extent, he was able to explain his position. Again, there's always the danger of managing expectations in governance. If you have performed at a certain level, the standard of assessment changes and I keep saying the challenge of a state like Lagos that is on the move. In fact, you are no longer judged by the standard of even fellow governors, you are judged by more global standards. People have started using a different yardstick to look at governance in Lagos. Like I said again, he explained himself very clearly that one; he’s coming in with a different team, the team he inherited in his first term, he had a throw over from the Asiwaju regime, so the experience. But you have to reinvigorate the team and so he’s coming in with a newer team this term and it’s going to take them a bit of time to settle down, to understand how it works. Even then projects are going, they may not be making the noise the way they made it before. I want to believe building roads or rehabilitating roads is no longer news to Lagosians. That is the standard that we have now set. So, Lagosians now are probably judging the present administration on a totally different standard. When he came in, it was exciting to see roads being built, it was exciting to see street lights coming up but now, the standard has changed, people have now taken that for granted, and maybe that’s why we now see the situation of what is going on. But like I said, I think he explained himself and it made sense.
Is there any plan to revive the Democratic People’s Alliance (DPA) on the platform of which you contested in 2007?
By the time we got to 2011, key members of the DPA had moved on, at least come together to form the Mega Party and at that stage, I took a step back from that arrangement. So, I am not sure where or what stage it is, so I have not been involved in the Mega Party which I believed that the DPA was very much involved in; at that stage, I had pulled back.
Is there any plan of contesting for any position in 2015?
I remain very much in politics and once you remain in politics, then all options remain open. I have not retired from politics, so to that extent, I am looking at my options and I will pick my option at the appropriate time.
Are you saying that you and Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu still maintain good relationship despite the seeming gap between you and the ACN?
My relationship with Asiwaju has never changed and you can quote me on that; before 2007 and after, the relationship has not changed and has remained the same. It’s not like it has gotten worse or closer, so people shouldn’t insinuate that there is something cooking between us that only the two of us know; that is not true but the relationship remains the same, cordial, mutual respect. So, I’m not going to deny that and there’s no agreement under as people rumoured.
Don’t you think the controversy on the issue of toll gate and other things are making people to lose interest in this present administration?
Well, I think the toll gate fees issue was mismanaged. Again, we are learning lessons in governance as in how to manage the people, I think if anything, the flaw in the toll gate issue was probably that there is a measure of taking the community affected a bit for granted. There had been negotiations and discussions; similar to what you had with the labour on the fuel subsidy that you have been discussing for a long time, that you have been discussing for a long time doesn’t mean that the people have accepted your position. And I think that’s the message that came out with regard to the toll gate issue.



Al-Mustapha’s death sentence was miscarriage of justice- Fasehun







 DR. FREDRICK FASEHUN IS THE FOUNDER OF ODUA PEOPLES’ CONGRESS (OPC) IN NIGERIA. IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH NIGERIA POLITICS ONLINE, HE OPPOSES THE DEATH SENTENCE HANDED DOWN BY JUSTICE MOJISOLA DADA AGAINST MAJOR HAMZA AL-MUSTAPHA, THE FORMER CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER TO MAXIMUM DICTATOR, SANNI ABACHA AND LATEEF SHOFOLAHAN AND AIDE TO LATE KUDIRAT ABIOLA; FUEL SUBSIDY REMOVAL BY PRESIDENT JONATHAN; INSECURITY AND INCESSANT ATTACKS BY THE ISLAMIST MILITANT SECT, BOKO HARAM AMONG OTHER ISSUES. HE SPOKE WITH OPEYEMI ADESINA

What grouse do you have with the death sentence on Al-Mustapha and Shofolahan?
I don't think Nigeria subscribes to capital punishment now and this is happening all over the world. The right to life is the right of everyone. Al-Mustapha has been incarcerated for about 14 years. Is Nigerian Judiciary explaining to the world that they kept somebody awaiting trial for 14 years? And after trying him, they sentenced him to death? So, I don't think it is fair; it is not fair. I'm sure the sentence will be re-visited in the Appeal Court and that is my own hope and also my own prayer.
Regardless of crimes committed, a very popular political philosopher once said, “An eye for an eye will leave the world blind.” So, If you take life for life, what happens to life generally? I'm one of those who suffered from the position of Al-Mustapha but as a Christian, I have forgiven him. Should I indulge him for this number of years, should I begrudge Sani Abacha for this number of years?
Al-Mustapha was given a duty to do; to procure security of the Head of State. If he was not given a prescription, that ‘don't go beyond this, don't do this and don't do that.’ If he did that work, the way he knew best, do you think it is right to sentence him to death?
About the death of Kudirat Abiola, Al Mustapha did not shoot Alhaja Kudirat Abiola; somebody said he was sent to carry out that shooting, where is that somebody? What sentence have we given to the man who held the gun and the man who said he held the gun has since come to court? He broke his silence in the open court and said he was induced to tell that lie. Are we going to be the devil's advocate? That prosecution witness was concurred. He confessed that he did it, but he had to tell a lie against Al-Mustapha because the state induced him to tell that lie. I understand in Criminal Cases, when there is an element of doubt, you resolve the matter in favour of the suspect. So these are some of the reasons I thought that judgement was too harsh, very unfair and I will call it “The miscarriage of justice.”
Another prosecution witness, who said he drove the gunmen to the site of the murder, said, while that murder was going on there, on the 4th of June, he was getting married in Kazaure in Bauchi State. He got married at 11'o clock, they said Kudirat was shot around 10'0 clock and the man who was involved in the shooting was getting married in Kazaure, Bauchi State, an hour later, how possible is that even if he had his personal jet that will lift him from the sight of the murder.
Well, pure judgement is not found on earth, pure judgement rests with God. Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, somebody we all admired for her courage, for her steadfastness, died many years ago. What we should be doing is celebrating her memory, not sentencing another person to death on her behalf.

But as a Yoruba leader, don't you think your position runs against the position of majority of Yoruba people who believe that real justice has be done to the memory of one of their own who was killed in such a brutal manner?

I'm not apportioning or allotting blame, I'm saying that we should view the situation with humanity. There is no way somebody as prominent among the Yoruba people as Alhaja Kudira was, would die under nasty circumstances and would not divide Yoruba people. Someone who admire her like me, would say, no, let's go all out to right the wrong but some would be there to say don't let us cause national crisis, that's my own position, that, time usually a healer has healed that wound and but the memory remained with us because she is our daughter, she is a Yoruba citizen and she played the part Yoruba people wanted her to play, she played that part well. Whether she died as a heroine like she did or as a villain, time will heal that wound and that is why I said, at my age I have no reason to start flexing muscles and causing crises among my people but I'm saying, let us view the whole thing with humanity, that was why I started with Mahatma Gandhi's quotation that says: “An eye for an eye will leave the world blind.” So, I'm not taking a position opposite to my people but I am assuaging my people that the characteristics, the cultural Yoruba of fairness and sense of justice should be called into play.

You were reported to have travelled to the North several times over Al-Mustapha's case trying to rally support for him, what really did you achieve in that regards?
That is a lie, I never travelled to the North to rally support for him. What for? With what intent? The matter was in court, if I started rallying support for him when he was still in detention and nobody knew the way the wind will blow, it is not true, I didn't go to Kano on behalf of Al-Mustapha.

Some people felt you were betraying the Yoruba cause with your hobnobbing with the Northern elements to get personal advantages. How do you react to that?
Personal advantages at Seventy-seven (77)? When would I use those personal advantages, and have I taken any advantage of any situation all my life? Go and find out if I had taken advantages of any situation, I would have become a millionaire. The former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Dimeji Bankole left here just 10 minutes before you came in, to thank me on the position I took on his matter. You can ask him if he gave me a kobo.
I'm a crusader for social justice, I do not earn a kobo for my crusade and you can find out from any of the governors whom virtually all of them are my friends, find out from them if any of them buys me coke. Go and find out, it’s not my way of life. I allow you to go and investigate.
Somebody came to visit me from the East and he came to my office, he said 'is this your office?' I said Yes! This is my office, he said you are joking, then I said is there no table and seat? How do you expect me to live in a sumptuous place, that is, which I cannot afford. I don't take money from anybody, go and find out from your colleagues. What do I need it for? I'm going to be Seventy-seven (77) in September, how are my even sure that I will even clock 77, except by the grace of God.

Is the entire Odua People's Congress (OPC) in agreement on this opposition to the judgement or this is your personal position?

OPC never sat anywhere to discuss about Al-Mustapha, so it is my personal position but the organisation has also not sat me down to castigate me for my position, so you can work out the question.

Is Gani Adams in agreement with your position?

I don't know, it's up to him, if he shares the sentiment with me to fight for social justice, then he will agree with me but I don't know his position.

What is your view about the removal of fuel subsidy removal by the President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan?

My position which I made very clear is that removal of fuel subsidy is ill-timed. It came just as people were preparing to expenditure spree that happened at Xmas and New Year, preparing to pay school fees and some preparing to pay house rent and now government stepped in and slammed oil tax on the people. I thought it is unfair, undemocratic, that was inflicting pain on the general citizenry. And as it is, the cost of virtually everything has gone up, who suffers more? Is it those in government or the common man? The masses will suffer!
Every government in any civilised community exists for the comfort and convenience of the people governed, not the other way. Although, in our country, those who are being governed exist for the convenience for the comfort and convenience of those in government, that is not democratic. So, if the vast majority of the citizenry said don't inflict petrol tax on us, the government should have listened and avoided such infliction of pains because my own definition of democracy is; 'the wish of the majority of people', if we said no, don't inflict pain on us and the government goes ahead to inflict that pain, that government is not democratic. Not only that, I will want a situation where the sincerity of the government is assured. If you told us that you will inflict oil tax by March or April and the people are anxiously waiting, and you now came like a dove from the blue and you inflicted that pain three months earlier without warning, without preparation, is that fair to the people? No!
Not only that, subsequent government had removed subsidy, they have inflicted fuel tax which they called subsidy and such removal had happened in at least 20 times in our recent political history, where is the cumulative fund? On what are we spending such funds? Not promising us that if we removed this, we will use it on infrastructures, on health, on education, on this and that, what about the previous ones? On what have you spent it?
When SAP was introduced, Babaginda made sure that that matter was discussed exhaustively. We discussed it in schools, colleges, students' organisation, factories, non-governmental organisations, and so on and so forth. And the people said they did not want SAP and IBB reconsidered his decision. This oil tax is more directly inflicting pains on the people. Why didn't government subject it to national discourse? It would have been better if the government has subjected it to national discourse and majority have said let us comply, that is democracy. So, a seemingly democratic government came in and started ruling like a dictatorship.

What can you proffer as lasting solution concerning the insecurity in the country?
 Well, insecurity is the bane of Nigeria's social life. It is so permissive that nobody thinks safe everywhere, at home, in the office, in school, in church, in the mosque, on the road, anywhere, no Nigerian feel safe. Maybe Nigeria has been so careless to allow insecurity to grow from being a mini-school to now a monster. What government should do is to ensure that there is social justice, when injustice is permissive, the necessary consequence is insecurity. The Nigerian young person who goes to school from nursery school, primary school, University or College of Education and Polytechnic and comes out unemployed, hungry for years, obviously becomes angry. A hungry man is an angry man. He has prepared himself to a point when he's now waiting for the country to acknowledge to his anticipated contribution and the country is failing him. So, what does he do? He joins bad gang, he wants to feed and when he doesn't find it easy to feed, he takes up arms against his country and the country becomes insecure. Now, graduate unemployment pushes you to do two things, you either become an undesirable element in the community or if you are a girl, you end up in prostitution, either of which is undesirable. What steps have we taken to ensure that this social injustice is not promoted?
Government also has committed a lot of atrocities in the past against the citizenry. Take the South-South for instance, you have oil under their soil in the South-South and you come in as the Federal Government and you started exploring for oil. In the process of exploring, you have destroyed the fiona, the environment and the treasures you got from underground, you moved elsewhere and the goose that laid the golden egg is unfed. The people of the South-South didn't kick until they saw Abuja, Lagos, Kano, Enugu and say for God sake, see what our money has paid for. In the meantime, the environment has been destroyed, the water polluted, the air polluted, their health going down, hunger pervasive and their environment nothing to talk about. Their health destroyed, children running about with different forms of rashes. On top of it, they remained uneducated, they remained unemployed, they remained hungry and therefore angry. They spoke to the government, Ken Saro Wiwa was for years speaking to the government about the picture I have painted and the government would not listen. Ken Saro Wiwa was a pacifist and unfortunately he was speaking to a deaf government and when you speak to the deaf, he doesn't understand what you are saying, that's why people in the Niger-Delta flexed muscles. When you are talking to the deaf and he doesn't understand what you are saying, you show, you gesticulate to convince him that you are speaking, and that's what happened in the South-South. You talked about Boko Haram, thousands and thousands and thousands of children who have no opportunity to go school and see criminal wealth being flaunted in their presence, so Boko Haram is not a religious affair, it is a class war. That's what many of us don't understand and when two people are simultaneously aggrieved and they clashed, the result is usually a flash. And government should not allow that to situation to develop, they should find Nigerians, trusted by both sides- Government and Boko Haram to mediate the crisis. Even when two countries sit down to declare a war, after fighting the war, they still come to table to discuss peace, so why must you go to war before you discuss peace? That's what government should do and some of us have been agitating for a sovereign national conference for years, saying let us re-order this nation, let us restructure and redesign this nation so that unity may be forged and Nigeria will move forward like a powerful nation and the people have been saying 'No'. So that's why the ethnic nationality of whatever ill are aggrieved and this is the time now for us to sit down, table our problems and proffer solutions and I hope the government will accede to that. But in the meantime, let the government look for honest, decent, uncommitted Nigerians to mediate the situation.




Tuesday 11 December 2012

SPORTS FESTIVAL: Another ACN show of mediocrity, says Lagos PDP



Opeyemi Adesina

The Lagos State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has described the hosting of the 18th National Sports festival as far below expectation as it did not measure up near the standard of the last sports festival hosted by Rivers State.

The party noted that the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) government has again failed Lagosians because the monumental monies believed to be realised from the Government and Non Government sectors of over 10 Billion Naira did not reflect in the Opening ceremony, Accommodation, Meals, closing ceremony and the medals won by the State Athletes. 

"It is indeed so embarrassing that with the available resources, enough to adequately organise the sports festival, athletes were deprived meals, accommodation, fair Officiating and standard Sports facilities to perform at their best. Funnily and in a very lazy Man's approach, the LOC blamed the inadequacies on alleged over accreditation of athletes! This is indeed an admission of failure and inability to properly run a State affair"

The Party posited that the state athletes were not well motivated and thus could not have "sacrificed" in order to win enough Gold for the State, thereby placing the State in a distant 3rd Position. 

"Similarly, the Spectators were not excited and the apathy was apparent as the games centres did not enjoy appreciable spectators which also took shine out of the games. By this shoddy hosting, the Mediocrity in ACN and the Lagos State State Government is further exposed and indeed now threatening the "Centre of Excellence" pride of the State.       

While the Lagos PDP is commending the Lagos State athletes for their selfless performances, the party is also demanding the House of Assembly to cause an immediate Public hearing into the activities of the LOC, especially in the areas of income & expenditure.




Monday 10 December 2012

SPORT: King Lionel Messi’s record in detail


King Lionel Messi’s record in detail


The details of the world record for goals scored in a calendar year beaten by the Argentinian at Betis on Sunday evening


 By scoring a brace at the Benito Villamarín, Leo Messi took his total in 2012 to 86 goals, beating the all-time record in a calendar year set by Gerd Müller (1972).

- In the league, Messi has scored 56 goals in 34 games, while Müller got 42 in 34 games.

- in Europe, Messi got 13 in 11 matches, while Müller got 10 in 4 matches.

- In the cup, Messi got 3 goals in 7 matches and Müller got 7 out of 6.

- September was Messi’s most productive month (13), while March (13) was the most prolific period for the former Bayern striker.

- Messi has scored 86 goals in 66 matches for Barça and Argentina. The German got 85 in 60.

- 76 of Messi’s goals were scored with his left foot, 7 with the right and 3 with his head.

- 74 were scored from inside the box (14 were penalties) and 12 outside (7 from free kicks).

- Malaga and Bayer Leverkusen (6) are the teams Messi has got the most goals against so far in 2012.

- Iniesta (9), Cesc (6) and Alexis (6) supplied him with the most assists.

- His 23 goals in 15 games are his best ever start to a Liga campaign, and equal the record set by Cristiano Ronaldo (2011/12).

- He has scored twice in his last five Liga appearances.

- On Sunday, Messi scored his first league goals at the Benito Villamarín, although he did score there once before in the cup in 2010/11.

- He had three shots on target, and two of those went in (the other struck both the goalkeeper and the post).

- He also completed 44 passes out of 54 attempts.

Sunday 9 December 2012

Lagos PDP lauds FG over donation of SURE-P luxury buses, N8 billion



Opeyemi Adesina 

The Lagos State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has commended the National government of PDP for assisting the LASG by donating SURE-P luxury buses and the sum of over 8billion Naira inorder to ease the Transportation and for the provision of portable water in the State. 

The Party holds that such gesture confirms that the PDP controlled National Government is indeed non-partisan on issues concerning the welfare of Nigerians in any part of the Country.
The Party is however not impressed that the LASG is playing politics with such Federal Government support to the State instead of putting same to public use.

"Our attention has been brought to the recent palliative supports the Federal Government has given to the lagos State Government inorder to eliminate the possible hardship as a result of the partial subsidy removal. 

"We note that such fatherly support is expected to be appreciated by a "bonafide child" who deserves further fatherly Love. Such federal Government supports in the areas of SURE-P employment, transportation, drainages, pipe borne Water amongst others ought to be made public and attributed to the Federal Government as support to the actual development of Lagos State. But Alas, these contributions are being politicised and concealed from Lagosians. 

"For example the exorbitant transportation fares in Lagos State can be forced down IF the Lagos State government put the buses into proper use for Lagosians. We fear that the Federal Government's good intention to improve social services in the transport sector may be jettisoned in lagos State unless the Federal Government buses are put on the road and fares reduced as intended by the SURE-P", the party added.

Breaking News! John Mahama declared winner of Ghanaian presidential election



Opeyemi Adesina

Dr. Kojo Afarijan has declared the NDC presidential candidate, John Dramani Mahama, the President-elect in Ghana. 

Mr. Mahama garnered 5,574,761 votes representing  50.70% of the total votes cast in Friday's Presidential election to win the election.


Details soon....

PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR VICE-PRESIDENT: ACN’S FALSEHOOD AND DECEIT


The Lagos state Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) €attention has been drawn to the hypocritical and highly deceptive comments of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) on the proposed official residence of the Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Architect Namadi Sambo.

First of all, it is sad that as a party, the ACN cannot differentiate between the office of the Vice President of Nigeria and the person of the incumbent occupant hence the party has fraudulently commented on the official quarters as if the PDP is planning to erect a mansion for its leaders.

Secondly, this comment by ACN is a further confirmation of its characteristic deceptive disposition and actions. For a party whose government in Lagos State is erecting as part of pension gifts to Mr. Bola Tinubu, a magnificent mansion in a choice area of Lagos state on two acres of land and on 400 square metres of reclaimed waterfront on which the Lagos State Government has so far spent N7 billion, there is no other way to describe the ACN other than being a party of deceitful and double-faced individuals.

It will be recalled that shortly before the end of his second term in office, the government of the present national leader of the ACN, Mr. Bola Tinubu, constructed a new Governor’s Lodge at a cost in excess of three billion naira. It is imperative to state that the now existing Lagos State Governor's Pension Law is enjoyed only by Mr Bola Tinubu as even the best lagos governor, ever, Alh Lateef Jakande is not a beneficiary.

We will like to alert the good people of Nigeria to the hypocritical and deceptive character of the ACN and its repeated acts of deliberate falsehood and hypocrisy. As late Chief Awolowo has rightly explained, it is a sign of weakness and utter dementia for the ACN in an attempt to commend itself to the public, to resort to a negative process of falsehood and hypocrisy.

The time has come for Nigerian people to know the ACN for what it represents-falsehood and deceit.      

Wednesday 5 December 2012

Breaking News! Again, explosion rocks Kano...as attempt to blow luxury bus fails


Uneasy calm pervades the ancient city of Kano following a time bomb that exploded near Zoo Road, Wednesday morning.

The incident is coming on the heels of a failed attempt by a yet-to-be identified group to blow up a luxury bus along  Zaria Road, by Kundila Housing Estate, yesterday night.

Security sources in the city confirmed there were no casualties in the two incidents, adding that troops have been deployed to the affected areas  to restore “confidence and normalcy”


*vanguard

Ikuforiji, others too arrogant to reverse oppressive, anti-people laws, says Lagos PDP



Opeyemi Adesina

The Lagos State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has described the Speaker, Adeyemi Ikuforiji and the entire Lagos State House of Assembly (LAHA) as a morally burdened, confused and anti people legislature that will be held responsible, jointly and severally to answer for the implications of all their obnoxious Laws which have now turned the state into a hyper tensed state.

The description is coming as a reaction to the diversionary call by the Speaker and some members of the LAHA that security personnel, especially the Police, should not be overzealous when enforcing the recently passed traffic Law.

"Honestly it is our assessment that this is the worst and anti People Legislature Lagos has ever had. It is expected that a Peoples Legislature must hear and support the wishes of the people. Unfortunately this LAHA is too arrogant to reverse obnoxious, oppressive and anti people Laws.

"The reactions coming against the Traffic Laws and especially the number of deaths and injuries being recorded as a result of the enforcement was enough for a listening and Pro people House of Assembly to repeal or atleast suspend the Law"

The party has thus predicted that 80% of the current members will either be recalled or resign when the people decide to vent their anger. It consequently advised that the LAHA should manifestly represent the Masses and eschew actions capable of causing them ridicule or hatred in the opinion of the people.

Friday 30 November 2012

Court remands couple in prison for assault on neighbour, theft




An Abuja Senior Magistrates’ Court on Friday remanded a couple, Gbenga and Elizabeth of GRA Mpape, Abuja, in prison for allegedly beating up one Rabinatu Adamu.

They were charged for assaulting and causing bodily harm to one Rabinatu Adamu.

They duo will spend 10 days in prison, because they were unable to meet the bail conditions granted by Senior Magistrate Grace Adebayo.

The Police Prosecutor, Mohammed Abdullahi, told the court that on November 20, Ms. Adamu also of GRA Mpape, reported the case to the Mpape Police Station.

Mr. Abdullahi said that the couple were involved in a fight with the complainant and her sister Alira Adamu, who got hurt in the process.

He said that during the fight, the accused allegedly stole a Techno cell phone valued at N7,000, a Nokia phone valued at N4,000 and N5,000 cash belonging to the complainant.

He said that the offence contravened the provisions of sections 79 and 247 of the Penal Code.
The accused, however, pleaded not guilty to the offence.

The senior magistrate granted the accused bail in the sum of N100,000 each with one surety each.

But as at the end of the court’s sitting, they were not able to meet the conditions for bail, as nobody came for them.

Mr. Adebayo, then, ordered that the couple be remanded in prison custody till the next adjourned date of December 10, for further hearing.

Nigeria Army demolishes Boko Haram ‘Bomb Factory’ In Zaria





The Nigeria Army has demolished a suspected Boko Haram bomb factory in Zaria, Kaduna State, recovering many important items.

The Assistant Director of Army Public Relations, Col. Sani Kukasheka Usman, who confirmed the action to SaharaReporters and also sent pictures of the recovered items, said that the incident followed a Cordon and Search Operation which it carried out with other security agencies in the Kwanar Shahada, Jushin Chiki area of the city.

He described the bomb factory as a two-bedroom bungalow, and that there were Improvised Explosive Devices in “stage one state of readiness.”
The operation also recovered several IED-making components that include:

•    17 Sensor Mechanical Timers (Remote Controls)
•    11 Primed Suicide Bombers Vests
•    36 Primed IEDs in “Bobo” cans
•    One military kitbag with support items like saw, hammer, cello tapes and guns
•    2 gallons of paint containing prepared IEDs
•    2 gallons of turkey oil brand with prepared IEDs
•    7 rolls of wires of various lengths
•    One bag containing several sensors
•    25 nine volt batteries

The spokesman said that a 60-year old man, Umaru Mohammed,was arrested within the premises, and the house demolished.
He did not say why it was essential to demolish the building rather than turn it over to the police for further investigation.

Wednesday 28 November 2012

ACN lambasts Tukur over insecurity


 
Opeyemi Adesina

The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) said the statement credited to Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Chairman Bamanga Tukur, that the PDP is not a security agency and should not be blamed for the insecurity in the country, is the clearest indication yet of the party’s alleged “cluelessness” over the worsening state of insecurity and other ills bedevilling the country.

In a statement issued in Lagos on Wednesday by its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, ACN said ”What the PDP Chairman is saying, in essence, is that his party is no longer fit to rule and that Nigerians should look elsewhere.”

ACN said it is inconceivable that a man of Alhaji Tukur’s standing, experience in public life and international exposure will not know the powers and responsibility of a ruling party.

”The PDP sired the President Goodluck Jonathan-led Federal Government that controls the security agencies in the country, and the party’s Chairman is not unaware of this fact.”

ACN in the statement urged Nigerians to take their destiny in their own hands.

”The insecurity that has now reached a level at which daring gunmen will attack the police and the military, the very institutions the country relies upon to ensure its internal and external security, is a reflection of the deep rot in other spheres of life in Nigeria.

”To be fair, the rot did not start in 1999. But 13 years is a long enough time for a party that is worth its name to make an appreciable effort to turn things around. Sadly, the situation is worse today than it was 13 years ago” ACN said.

Tuesday 27 November 2012

Igbo unity crucial ahead of 2015 elections - Kalu


Opeyemi Adesina

The former governor of Abia State, Dr. Orji Uzor Kalu, has said that engendering unity among the Igbo race is a crucial factor if the South East will make nay impact in the 2015 general election in Nigeria, especially the desire of the region to produce the next president of the country.

Kalu, who spoke in Washington DC, United States of America, in continuation of his advocacy visits for a president of Igbo extraction for Nigeria in 2015, said without unity, it would be impossible to make the dream come true.

At a dinner in his honour at the residence of Surveyor John and Lady Maria Juruobi in Washington DC, Kalu said it was in order to foster the much desired unity among the Igbo irrespective of political affiliation, religion, gender and other such divisive tendencies that a non partisan group, the Njiko Igbo, was formed.

The dinner, which was chaired by Mr. Ola Famuyiwa, had in attendance a cross section of Nigerians amongst whom were Mr. Henry Okadigbo, Barrister Ndubuisi Uche Umuma, Mr. George Udezor, Chief Anyaso Ojukwu, Engr A. Ola, Prof. Tunde Ayo, Mr. Daniel Eke, Mr. Seyi Ogunbiyi, Prof. Akin Ola, Dr. John Owolabi and Mr. Lawal Suleiman.

Kalu said Njiko Igbo would reconcile everyone in order to present a common voice for the repositioning of Ndigbo in terms of development and leadership positions.

He disclosed that those engaged in the project have been engaging stakeholders in the South East and other parts of the country on the marginalization of Ndigbo over the years and the need for a Nigerian president of Igbo extraction.

He further stated that the only compensation that could erase the years of marginalisation will be the acceptance of an Igbo man as president in 2015.

Kalu, who is the portem coordinator of Njiko Igbo, said: "Since the creation of the country to the era of the civil war and now, the Igbo race has suffered deep marginalisation.

"Yet, we have not considered this as we have supported other regions and zones to produce the president of the country.

"There can be no better befitting way of repaying us than allowing us to produce the president in 2015.

"And we have been working silently for a very long time building bridges of understanding all over the country to achieve this.

"Njiko Igbo is just the visible arm of the move to achieve a project that is very dear to the hearts of the genuine Igbo man and woman home
and abroad."

Kalu charged Nigerians in the Diaspora to imbibe the spirit of integrity in their profession and discipline in order to strengthen bilateral relationship between Nigeria and their country of residence.

Famuyiwa, in his remarks, stated that it will only be fair if the South East produces Nigeria’s president in 2015.

He said for 52 years that Nigeria has been independent without the Igbo having the opportunity to rule the country, other zones should compensate the region with the presidency since the south East has eminently qualified men and women that could rule the country. 

Sir Juruobi congratulated Kalu and Ndigbo on the Njiko Igbo project, which he described as the new face of Igbo.

He implored other Igbo groups and associations to compliment the efforts of Njiko Igbo in taking the South East to the Promised Land.

In the same vein, a businessman, George Udezor, called for the re-invigoration and emulation of the belief of our forefathers, anchored on peaceful co existence.

Mr. Henry Okadigbo, younger brother to the late former Senate President, Chief Chuka Okadigbo, disclosed that he was not surprised that Njiko Igbo sprang up, stating that is late brother, Dr. Kalu and a few Igbo leaders were always at the forefront of selfless fight for the people of the region.

He described Kalu as a reformer per excellence, with a strong will to fight a genuine cause for Ndigbo.

In his contribution, Barrister Uche Omuma decried the state of roads in the South East.

He made specific mention of the Enugu-Port Harcourt Expressway, which he used some months back on his way to his village and lamented on the state of Aba city in Abia State.

He called on government at all levels to be responsive to the plight of their people.

He also urged Igbos to rally support for Njiko Igbo, describing it as a collective advocacy forum for the repositioning of Ndigbo.

Engr A. Ola used the opportunity to introduce a new non governmental project, Diaspora Campaign for Democratic Change in Nigeria, which aims at promoting democratic values.

He said this initiative was conceptualized in response to various national and international calls for genuine democracy in Nigeria, where the average man’s voice counts.

He said: "We are tired with the political rigging and victimization, which has denied the people the opportunity to elect the leaders of
choice."

Sunday 25 November 2012

We'll puruse Igbo presidency to logical conclusion - Njiko Igbo



Opeyemi Adesina

Njiko Igbo, a non partisan political movement, has restated its position of pursuing its objective of the election of a president of Igbo extraction for Nigeria in 2015.

The acting National Publicity Secretary of Njiko Igbo, Brady Chijioke Nwosu, who stated the position of Njiko Igbo, lamented the marginalization of Ndigbo in national leadership positions and reaffirmed the resolve of Ndigbo at home and in the diaspora for the actualisation of Nigerian president of Igbo extraction in 2015.

Nwosu stated that Njiko Igbo, which stands for unity by mending fences and faces, is apolitical, without bias towards any political party or association.
 
He said the leadership of Njiko Igbo, including the Protem Coordinator, Dr. Orji Uzor Kalu, and the Chairman, Senator Sylvester Anyanwu, are apolitical.

He said: "The group is for all Igbo sons and daughters irrespective of age, religion, place of residence, political party, profession, association and economic status amongst others."

He described it is a common platform initiated to provide a common voice in the repositioning of the South East region in terms of development and leadership positions.

The acting secretary identified the aims and objectives of Njiko Igbo as the name connotes to include harmonisation of diverse interests in the South East zone of Nigeria, promotion of a common South East voice on national issues, rejuvenating the spirit of political participation among the grassroots across the zone as well as channeling commitment to positive national goals, building bridges across political tendencies in the zone and extending such bridges to other geopolitical zones for the full re-integration of the zone, amongst others.

Nwosu disclosed that the leadership and members of Njiko Igbo are consulting with stakeholders across the geopolitical zones of the country and outside Nigeria "to advocate our position on the Nigerian project."

He maintained that the Igbos have greatly contributed to the economic development of Nigeria and have also supported other regions in clinching the presidency, adding that this should be a period of compensation for Ndigbo for their patience, sacrifice and national contributions.

Nwosu disclosed that the project has received the support of Nigerians and promised to strengthen dialogue, consultation, stakeholders’ engagement, advocacy and campaign as key tools in driving the aspiration of Ndigbo.

He called on Ndigbo to be committed, courageous and focused for what he described as a selfless fight, imploring them to use social, print, electronic and other means of communication to share the message of Njiko Igbo globally.


Wednesday 21 November 2012

Speaker's trial incessant adjournments: Lagos PDP suspects ACN, EFCC conspiracy

Opeyemi Adesina

The Lagos State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has expressed his intention to file a petition against the EFCC if the anti corruption agency does not improve in its manner of handling the ongoing prosecution of the Speaker of LAHA, Adeyemi Ikuforiji.

The party's position is coming on the heels of five consecutive adjournments of the said trial which has been blamed on the unbelievable indisposition of the EFCC lead Counsel, Mr. Godwin Obla.

According to the Party, the allegations and trial are too serious to be dragged or indeed frustrated by the prosecution. The party warns that the prosecution's manner of seeking for adjournments in the matter can lead to a striking out of the Case. This can only be done to satisfy ACN as no excuse can hold waters.

"We strongly believe that the Speaker and ACN have the sympathy of the EFCC prosecution team as presently constituted, otherwise there won't be indiscriminate call for adjournment in a matter that the presiding judge, Okechukwu Okeke, is serious to dispense with on time. It may be a ploy for the case to be struck out for want of due diligence"

The Party has thus admonished the EFCC to prosecute the matter diligently, without fear or favour as lagosians and indeed Nigerians are monitoring same.

In the same vein, the Party has berated the members of the House who are quick to suspend sittings on the days of the Speaker's Trial, claiming Solidarity.

It would be recalled that the LAHA of Assembly speaker is on trial for allegedly embezzling 7Billion Naira of the House's fund.

Monday 19 November 2012

PRESS CONFERENCE ON THE NEW LAGOS TRAFFIC LAWS , THE OPERATONS OF MOALS AND THE FATE OF THE TRAVELLING PUBLIC IN LAGOS,THE STATE OF EXCELLENCE.


VENUE; PDP STATE SECRETARIAT, GRA IKEJA

 TIME; 9.AM PROMPT.



I, Dr. Segun Ogundimu, a former chairman Lagos state water corporation, commissioner for transport, chairman petroleum & petroleum products distribution & monitoring committee, and former Lagos state commissioner for Health, personally welcome you gentlemen of the press to this program , on behalf of the travelling Public to lend my solo voice to the ongoing appeal to our Excellency Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN) to please temper justice with mercy on this new traffic laws, christened “Draconian” by the people of Lagos.

 Your Excellency I know Governance is not an easy thing and I do appreciate the stress of Governance, and its varied challenges you are saddled with on daily basis which could be strong and worrisome enough to make a Governor hit at unintended hapless public. The law as relates to the okada operatives and whatever the challenges on your plates should not make you lose sight of the necessity to protect the travelling public. You should avoid been labeled an anti- people government. When an aggressive mosquito lands on “the place” caution is necessary to get rid of the nuisance pest, else the force will break “the place “and the mosquito will escape ‘this is a Yoruba proverb’. With benefit of hind sight, I recall with mixed feelings, my tenure as Lagos state Commissioner for public Transportation in the early 90’s. The problems, I was confronted with then, are not any different from yours, though I must admit that the population and the aggression is not as serious as now. Not with standing, no one tries to kill an ant with a sledge hammer without damaging the platform on which the ant rests. The challenges then, which are not different from what obtains now include but not limited to;
   1. Increasing population of okada operators.
   2. Untrained, ill-kitted and unlicensed operatives.
   3. A very sizeable no of operators are unemployed school leavers( some of whom are graduates) are non- indigenes who have noticed the yawning gap in the State’s supply side of public transportation and taken up the gauntlet in challenge created by this inadequate support for the travelling public. The primary aim is to irk a living rather than engage in more devastating tendencies to keep body & mind together.
   4. Increasing tendencies of operators to be hired by negative groups to perpetrate nefarious activities state- wide, especially rendering Reece services to people of questionable characters.
   5. Active and outright participation of operators in armed and unarmed crime as been reported by security operatives.
   6. Increasing violation of traffic laws e.g. riding against traffic flow with overloading.
   7. Increasing road traffic accidents with serious orthopedic consequences to outright death of one or both rider & passenger.
   8. There are so many others too numerous to catalogue here. 

 No doubt, these are very worrisome challenges confronting your Excellency but I make bold to say with respect sir, that not serious enough to attract such reactions currently plaguing and incapacitating the travelling public, a blackish I want to believe was not thought of ab-inito.  

The law strangulating the operations of the okada operatives must be looked into again for the sake of the travelling public.

The alternatives opened to the public are
   1. The BRT operations, good concept but badly operated from stand point :
   a) Of ever escalating cost per person.
   b) Poorly maintained vehicles.
   c) Recklessness of the drivers and occasional fatal consequences.
   d) Restriction on areas of coverage as they cannot operate in state & most local Government roads because of very bad, ill-maintained & narrow road network.
   2. Taxis: these charge exorbitantly because of high rapid returns on service of the high loans given to operators. You may not know this ,the lucky few participants or allotees of the STATE-OWNED private partnership access to purchase of taxis under the scheme is excruciating and at the end of the rope are the travelling public whose take home pay does not take them home.
   3. Use of the popular danfo and Molues with the attendant infestation with bedbugs, unkempt rough seats and risk of ‘one chance’ a common parlance associated with regular robbery attacks in these vehicles.  
   4. Trekking up and down the dusty/ muddy streets of Lagos. Good as this may be health-wise, certainly does not fit into the 21st century Public transportation arrangement.

The only viable and swift means of affordable Public transportation in Lagos today is the OKADA mode.

 A transportation mode analysis done in Lagos in 1994 shows the following percentage usage by the travelling public as 

97%- Road Mode

2%- Rail Mode

1% -water Mode

This led to my initiating, on the strength of the reports of Dar al- andarsal Consultant to world-bank on metropolitan Lagos, the” Rail-Road- Sea” intermodal coordination which was aimed at reducing the road mode, a major cause of traffic congestion in our city. A beef up of Rail & Water Modes was intended then. We actually commenced the process of integration of these 3 modes, but for the constant change in Governance at that time. With the assistance of the Federal Government, a second pair of rails was laid from Ijoko Railway Station to Ijora Wharf. We did put in place a double-deckered katamaran Boat M.V, Odoragunshen (with 1,400 passengers capacity) to Ferry commuters from Ijora to Apapa -and C.M.S from where smaller buses transport commuters to Ikoyi, Federal Secretariat, Obalende, bourdillon, Awolowo road, Ebute-ero, Osborne and beyond. I really do not know the where about of M V Odoragunshen bought with $2 millions Lagos state money. Please tell us. 

 In collaboration with Federal Inland Waterways and their ferry fleet, we mass- transported commuters from Ijora to Oworonshoki -to Ebute ero-to Ikorodu-Maroko to mention a few.

I believe there are more serious developmental program in the transportation area to tap into and occupy your plate, than running after miserable souls who are out to make a living, no thanks to our poor educational system that is skewed towards white collar jobs instead of a policy that produces employers of labor as against job seekers.
 Recently the PUNCH newspaper, a voice and soul of the masses reported the burning & crushing of 3,000 motor- cycles in Lagos. Many people could not believe their eyes, but for the reliable source- PUNCH. Your Excellency 3,000 struggling poor souls reduced to more joblessness and asked to bite the dust. Millions naira loans from some financial institutions down the drain, just like that. Rather than confiscate and crush or burn their motorbike, I will suggest a more pragmatic look into their case again, so that we don’t jump from fry -pan into fire. These trampled upon and bruised people may become more violent and take to daring armed or non- armed robbery attacks on people to irk a living. More devasting effect of the ban on the Okada riders in certain areas is made manifest in the harrowing stress imposed on the travelling public, the increase in transportation cost, high morbidity rate, clear and present danger of loss of job for coming late to work place by the working class that patronize these riders even at the risk of their lives in the absence of an affordable alternative. Congregation of the travelling public in black spots, like Oshodi, Marine beach, Marina CMS, ojuelegba, ojota, Anthony Under-bridge to mention a few, increases the risk of attacks by the league of hoodlums that would be swelled by the deprived Okada riders. What is then the joy of been governed by Midas touch- hearted Governor.

The case of ONDO’s Mimiko is quite instructive, where the people spoke loud and clear with their votes in support of their listening Governor’s second coming. Please take a cue from the Federal Government that listens to the cry of the people:
   1. The change of position on fuel increase.
   2. Change of position on the N5000 notes
   3. Change of heart on the Niger Delta militants. 
   4. Bakasi issue and the practical assessment of issues than the sentimental clap trap attached to ownership based on false premise.

Rather than the current war on Okada operatives, I call on you to please revisit the issue and work out a master plan on how to accommodate these avoidable challenges. I believe in strong regulation rather than outright ban. Implementing stronger regulation will even generate more jobs within the sea of these unemployed graduates in search of a lively hood.

If you will put aside our political differences I am willing, for the sake of the Okada riders and the travelling public, to share notes on how to salvage this ugly situation that has refused to go way and getting worse by the day. It will be difficult to wish these riders away without a viable source of income and affordable swift mode of transportation for the travelling public as an alternative.

Finally, your Excellency, may I humbly draw your attention to the ever present deplorable conditions of the State and local Government roads and drainages. It is as if all the Local Government simply went to sleep after the LASEIC Chairman, a retired Judge in our state awarded victory to all the 57 LCDA, , without a mention of votes scored for or against almighty ACN in Lagos. We thank the same judiciary for seeing these anomalies and now set to do justice.

The State and Local Government roads and drainages if put in place and commensurate with the monthly FAC allocation and IGR to our LGs in Lagos, things will be better than they are now. All the feeder roads and tributaries would be opened up, there will be less tension on major axial roads(inward and outward) like Ikorodu road, Herbert Macaulay, Western avenue, agege motor, isolo, ikotun-egbe, Egbeda roads, Abeokuta-Express way ; all the link roads will be put into full use, there will be less stress within the round house in alausa and less tendency to vent anger on these struggling souls. I tell you with authority as someone who has been closely associated with roads and drainages in Lagos that, global warming is not a major cause of flooding in our state. Rather the major causes are, the deplorable state of all our non-flowing secondary and tertiary drains and the incessant sand- filling of our water body with attendant rise in the water-table below the ground, in the state in an attempt to create empire for the novoriche and greedy hawks in power. The six primary channels in Lagos are totally blocked. Some are now places of abode to giant reptiles, crocodiles, alligators, monkeys and other animals, while Government is playing pranks with others channels 2-6. A major channel to the lagoon is the famous Odo iya’laro, between ojota and Maryland, that is totally blocked. All storm water westwards from ikeja environ are trapped and hence the flooding in those areas. Your Excellency you may not know this, not 1 (one) secondary or tertiary drain flows in any Local Government. I challenge you to take a tour to any of your LCDA to prove me right or wrong. 

Many years ago this State witnessed regular competitions amongst LGA from stand point of cleanliness, roads and drainage repairs and maintenance. Are these no longer the duties of our Local Government offices? You really need to wake up these officials so you can have peace of mind rather than stirring the Horner’s nest. The roads in areas like Ajegunle, ajangbadi, alaba, ijagemo, akowonjo, agege ,tabon tabon, iju agbado, ikotun egbe, ikorodu, Somolu, Bariga, oworonshoki, Badagry etc. It is as if these rural roads are cursed, yet they get allocation from FAC regularly apart from the IGR milked from the people monthly. Your Excellency please wake up your Local council areas, the people there are really suffering. Ikoyi Victoria Island, Lekki and Ajah areas are not all spared of the rot in our road network. You must do something about real issues in the state rather than pursue Okada riders all over the place.

My words of caution to the established Okada association in Lagos, please do not take the laws into your hands,remember two wrongs don’t make a right. Violence is an ill-wind that blows no one any good, continue to adopt dialogue because at the end of any struggle we still end up at a round table.

Human right activists and the civil liberty societies the whole world is watching this avoidable unfolding drama playing out.  

 Let’s avoid a state of anarchy in an otherwise peaceful State.

 Your Excellency, the fact that this is your last stanza does not mean you throw the people to the marines are careless about their plight. Be mindful of history and posterity.

This is the only state you can call yours.

 I salute and wish you well.

Gentlemen of the press, I thank you all for your attention.



-Dr, Segun Ogundimu, MBBS, FWACP

  PDP, CHIEFTAIN IN LAGOS.



Sunday 18 November 2012

Abia PPA condemns inequitable demolition of shops in Abia



Opeyemi Adesina

The Chairman of the Abia State chapter of the Progressive Peoples Alliance, Prince Emeka Okafor, has condemned in strong terms the recent demolition of shops at the Umuahia Timber Market, popularly known as Timber Shade Market, by the state government, saying it was inequitable.

Okafor said the demolition in the timber market, owned by independent marketers of building and allied materials, was unjust, unfair and quite unfriendly.

He stated that the government or its agents displayed preferential treatment, favouring those believed to be allies of the government or those in government circles to the detriment of others.

He also said the properties should not in the first instance have been destroyed considering the staggering amount used in putting them up and the present economic situation of the country.

The PPA boss also faulted the alleged allocation of the land acquired by the government from the demolition exercise to some its favourites instead of the original owners of the land.

Okafor called on the Abia State Government to retrace its steps and concentrate on measures that will impact positively on the welfare of all Abians and save the citizens from further hardship and untold harassment.

Saturday 17 November 2012

My clamour for Igbo presidency not party based - Kalu



A former Governor of Abia State, Dr. Orji Kalu, has said that his clamor for a president of Igbo origin in Nigeria in 2015 is not based on the platform of any political party.

Kalu, at different fora in the United States of America last week, said that to achieve the lofty aim, it has to be beyond the confines of a political party, hence the formation of a non partisan political movement, the Njiko Igbo.

He said it has thus become imperative for all Igbo sons and daughters, home and abroad, to unite behind the Njiko Igbo for the realization of the objective of having, for the first time in Nigeria, an elected president of South-East origin.

A statement by his Special Adviser, Oyekunle Oyewumi, quoted Kalu as saying: "I am playing the role of protem coordinator of Njiko Igbo for the unity of our region in particular and Nigeria as a whole, using this platform to bring Igbo sons and daughters together irrespective of their political affiliations and associations."

Kalu, who spoke first at a dinner in his honor by Yoruba professionals at the residence of Chris Ogunrinde in Charlotte, North Carolina, added that as a person charged with the noble role of coordinating the aspirations of the Igbo and reaching out to others regions, he needed to be neutral by not associating with any political party at this point.

Kalu said: "I need to be neutral at all levels in achieving a unifying platform for this laudable project.

"However, we are ready to support any political party that zones its presidential ticket to the South East, which is in line with our cardinal objective.

"We have many qualified and dynamic people who have both the technical expertise and wealth of experience in the private and public sectors that are fit to occupy the position of Nigeria's president. "We have people who have excelled in the academia, business, politics and philanthropic areas of life among others and have contributed positively to economic growth of the country. "Those are the people we need to look at and put forward our best foot in 2015." Responding, Ogunrinde applauded the commitment of Kalu in promoting unity in Nigeria. Ogunrinde described him as a bridge builder with network of contacts beyond boundaries.  He acknowledged the support of Igbos in voting en masse for the late Chief M.K.O. Abiola and Chief Olusegun Obasanjo in the 1993 and 1999/2003 presidential elections, promising to mobilize Nigerians in the USA to support the move for a president of South East origin. At another parley with a cross section of Igbos in the USA, Kalu passed across the same message, soliciting for support for the project. Dr. A. Eze, a Consultant Surgeon, who spoke on behalf of others, pledged their unalloyed support to the Igbo cause.  Eze stated that Igbos have contributed immensely to the development of Nigeria in all ramifications and deserve to be given the opportunity to lead the country. Also commenting at the event, a friend of Dr. Eze's, Mr. Abdullahi Umar, poured encomiums on Dr. Kalu.  Umar went down memory lane on the selfless fight of Dr. Kalu when he held sway as the president, Student Union Government of the University of Maiduguri, Borno State. He commended him for declining the offer by the school authority to pardon him alone during the protest of the SUG that led to the rustication of the students' leaders unless everyone involved was pardoned. Drawing from his actions from his school days to his experience in the private and public sectors, Umar admonished Dr. Kalu to contest the presidency in 2015.  He acknowledged his role in building the PDP with the likes of Dr. Alex Ekwueme, General Ibrahim Babaginda, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, late Chief S.M. Afolabi and General Aliyu Gwarzo among others and also the Progressive Peoples Alliance, which have both produced political office holders. In another development, Dr. Kalu was a guest at the anniversary dinner of the North Carolina chapter of the Jewish National Association, where he thanked them for their support and sought for the strengthening of cordial relationship with Nigerians.  Dr. Kalu stated that by identifying the challenges, developing responses and delivering support and strength, both could make the world a better place for us all.  The association said it was delighted to have Nigerians grace this year’s anniversary dinner and promised to extend the same invite next year.

Fashola's celebration of 2,000 days in office amid apparent poverty, human rights abuses is shameful, says Lagos PDP


Opeyemi Adesina

As the Lagos State Government celebrates 2,000 days in office tomorrow, Sunday, the Lagos State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has described it as a jamboree that is absolutely shameful and irrational.

In a statement made available to the Press, the Publicity Secretary of the party, Barr. Taofik Gani, marvelled at the monumental financial waste that accompanies such unnecessary exercise and asserted that such monies would improve lives and provide more social services if utilised.

The party submitted that celebrating days without commensurate infrastructure is inglorious and deceitful, hence threatened to invite the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to the state having observed that such is a conduit pipe for defrauding the state .

The statement reads in part: "The Lagos State PDP is cautioning the ACN government of Lagos State not to waste Lagos funds in its disillusioned and misdirected celebrations of the number of days in government.

"We posit that the monumental amount usually spent on mobilising ACN members to such party can be ploughed to improve the lots of Lagosians rather than living in fool's world that Lagosians are happy with them.

"The Party challenges the ACN to dare Lagosians by measuring its achievements through street parade and see whether the reactions will be positive or negative.

"Honestly, this is a pathologicaly deceitful and propagandist political party that has indeed become a metastatised shameless party in government. How on earth can a sensible government plan celebration in Office when there is apparent poverty, lack of employment, underpaid civil servants and violation of human Rights to mention a few.

"Inspite getting total revenue of over 56billion Naira Monthly, the State is still not enjoying such developments that are social services. All the assumed developments in the State are indeed by concessionaires and donors. Notwithstanding, they are highly paid for to enjoy. The celebration will be another talk Party of "I will do" and not "I have done" It is our belief that monies are been syphoned through this activity because it is just too often and non-sensical" "We may invite the EFCC into the activities of certain parastatals and contractors of the Lagos State Government now discovered as conduits for the looting of Lagos Funds.

Thursday 8 November 2012

Stop the threat: Lagos PDP counsels Fashola



Opeyemi Adesina

The Lagos State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has counselled the Lagos State Governor to adopt a more diplomatic, Civil and honourable manner of addressing Nigerians, especially in his usual threats to non-Lagosians to leave the state or be ready to face his manner of governance.

The Party speaking through its State Chairman, Tunji Shelle, posited that it is very unbecoming of the State Governor to be quick in asking non lagosians to leave lagos state whenever such persons seek redress or demand their Rights as Nigerians.

This position is coming as a reaction to the latest assertion by the governor that the Lagos traffic Law and other unpopular laws in the state must be obeyed and that those who are not ready to obey or live in lagos in particular manners should return to their villages.

"We are taken aback to hear a Governor, lawyer and indeed SAN threaten or make statements suggestive of ignorance to nigerians. Under no circumstance can anybody, not even the president, "deport" any Nigerian from any state in the country.

The Right of a Nigerian to live and not be discriminated against is guaranteed under the constitution of our great country. No Law can thus be made to frustrate or erode such guarantee. The Governor ought to know this and remain civil" The Party has thus called on the presidency and the National Assembly to call the Lagos State governor to order to respect the sacrosanct Right of every Nigerian to live in any part of the Country.

Similarly, the party has called on the Leaders and Elders of lagos State to advise the governor against taking steps that can expose lagosians outside the state to hatred.


Tuesday 23 October 2012

News Flash: Suicide bomber attempt on Arik Air




A boko haram member today allegedly attempted to blow up an Arik Air plane that just landed at the ABUJA Airport from Maiduguri.

The suicide bomber this afternoon (Tuesday) stood up inside the plane while it was on air and told all the passengers to pray. He said his main targets were the foreign people in the plane.

Unfortunately for him the bomb refused to detonate in the plane.

He has been arrested and handed over to the appropriate authorities.

More details soon...

Judge’s absence delays trial of Ogbulafor, former PDP boss, over N170m scam






The trial of a former National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Vincent Ogbulafor, over an alleged N170 million contract fraud, was stalled on Tuesday following the absence of the judge.

The Judge at the Abuja High Court, Ishaq Bello, who last presided over the matter on July 11, was said to have travelled to Saudi Arabia for the pilgrimage. Mr. Bello was expected to hear the testimony of a principal witness of the prosecution.

The trial is now expected to continue on Wednesday, November 7.

The prosecutor, a Senior Legal Officer with the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission, ICPC, paul Bassi, said the new date was given to the counsel to Mr. Ogbulafor, Joe Gadzama, by the court clerk.

The ICPC is prosecuting Mr. Ogbulafor, Jude Nwokolo, Henry Ikoh and Emeka Emmanuel on a 16-count charge of alleged involvement in a N170 million fraud. The agency alleged that while serving as the Minister of State for Economic Affairs in 2001, the former PDP leader connived with the others to float three fictitious companies through which they perpetrated the fraud.

They were alleged to have used Henrichiko Nig. Ltd, DHL Consultants, and Chekwas Industries to siphon N82.6 million, N11.5 million and N6.2 million, respectively in 2001.

The prosecution also alleged that Mr. Ogbulafor used his position as the Head of the National Economic Intelligence Committee, set up to verify debts owed local contractors, to pass some forged documents.
On May 30, six months after the case was adjourned indefinitely, the judge granted permission to ICPC to reopen its case on July 11 and July 12.

The decision followed an application filed by ICPC Counsel, Adegboye Awomolo, asking for the case to be relisted on the court list. The application was after a stay of proceedings in the case, pending the determination of a motion he filed at the Court of Appeal.

ICPC asked for the stay of proceedings because the commission was challenging Mr. Bello’s ruling granting Mr. Ogbulafor’s application for severance of trial, delivered on December 14, 2010.

Bello had severed the trial because Mr. Nwokolo, Mr. Ikoh and Mr. Emanuel filed a case at the Court of Appeal, challenging the ruling of the court in which the judge said they had a case to answer in the matter.

Bello said that because the appeal filed by the three accused persons had yet to be heard, the trial had to be severed so that the others could stand trial after their appeal had been determined.



Premium Times

Transcript of Obama-Romney Presidential Debate (Part 1-8)







Transcript of Obama-Romney Presidential Debate (Part 1-8)

2012 presidential debate: President Obama and Mitt Romney’s remarks at Lynn University on Oct. 22 2012

This is a complete transcript of President Obama and Mitt Romney’s remarks at the third and final presidential debate at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Fla., on Oct. 22, 2012. Remarks from the two candidates were updated as the debate unfolded.

BOB SCHIEFFER, MODERATOR: Good evening from the campus of Lynn University here in Boca Raton, Florida. This is the fourth and last debate of the 2012 campaign, brought to you by the Commission on Presidential Debates.

SCHIEFFER: The audience has taken a vow of silence -- no applause, no reaction of any kind, except right now when we welcome President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney.

(APPLAUSE)

Gentlemen, your campaigns have agreed to certain rules and they are simple. They’ve asked me to divide the evening into segments. I’ll pose a question at the beginning of each segment. You will each have two minutes to respond and then we will have a general discussion until we move to the next segment.

Tonight’s debate, as both of you know, comes on the 50th anniversary of the night that President Kennedy told the world that the Soviet Union had installed nuclear missiles in Cuba, perhaps the closest we’ve ever come to nuclear war. And it is a sobering reminder that every president faces at some point an unexpected threat to our national security from abroad.

So let’s begin.

SCHIEFFER: The first segment is the challenge of a changing Middle East and the new face of terrorism. I’m going to put this into two segments so you’ll have two topic questions within this one segment on the subject. The first question, and it concerns Libya. The controversy over what happened there continues. Four Americans are dead, including an American ambassador. Questions remain. What happened? What caused it? Was it spontaneous? Was it an intelligence failure? Was it a policy failure? Was there an attempt to mislead people about what really happened?

Governor Romney, you said this was an example of an American policy in the Middle East that is unraveling before our very eyes.

SCHIEFFER: I’d like to hear each of you give your thoughts on that.

Governor Romney, you won the toss. You go first.

ROMNEY: Thank you, Bob. And thank you for agreeing to moderate this debate this evening. Thank you to Lynn University for welcoming us here. And Mr. President, it’s good to be with you again. We were together at a humorous event a little earlier, and it’s nice to maybe funny this time, not on purpose. We’ll see what happens.

This is obviously an area of great concern to the entire world, and to America in particular, which is to see a -- a complete change in the -- the structure and the -- the environment in the Middle East.

With the Arab Spring, came a great deal of hope that there would be a change towards more moderation, and opportunity for greater participation on the part of women in public life, and in economic life in the Middle East. But instead, we’ve seen in nation after nation, a number of disturbing events. Of course we see in Syria, 30,000 civilians having been killed by the military there. We see in -- in Libya, an attack apparently by, I think we know now, by terrorists of some kind against -- against our people there, four people dead.



Transcript of the Third Round of the Obama-Romney Presidential Debate, October 22, 2012.....Part 2.....

Our hearts and -- and minds go out to them. Mali has been taken over, the northern part of Mali by al-Qaeda type individuals. We have in -- in Egypt, a Muslim Brotherhood president. And so what we’re seeing is a pretty dramatic reversal in the kind of hopes we had for that region. Of course the greatest threat of all is Iran, four years closer to a nuclear weapon. And -- and we’re going to have to recognize that we have to do as the president has done. I congratulate him on -- on taking out Osama bin Laden and going after the leadership in al-Qaeda.

But we can’t kill our way out of this mess. We’re going to have to put in place a very comprehensive and robust strategy to help the -- the world of Islam and other parts of the world, reject this radical violent extremism, which is -- it’s certainly not on the run.

ROMNEY: It’s certainly not hiding. This is a group that is now involved in 10 or 12 countries, and it presents an enormous threat to our friends, to the world, to America, long term, and we must have a comprehensive strategy to help reject this kind of extremism.

SCHIEFFER: Mr. President?

OBAMA: Well, my first job as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the American people safe. And that’s what we’ve done over the last four years.

We ended the war in Iraq, refocused our attention on those who actually killed us on 9/11. And as a consequence, Al Qaeda’s core leadership has been decimated.

In addition, we’re now able to transition out of Afghanistan in a responsible way, making sure that Afghans take responsibility for their own security. And that allows us also to rebuild alliances and make friends around the world to combat future threats. Now with respect to Libya, as I indicated in the last debate, when we received that phone call, I immediately made sure that, number one, that we did everything we could to secure those Americans who were still in harm’s way; number two, that we would investigate exactly what happened, and number three, most importantly, that we would go after those who killed Americans and we would bring them to justice. And that’s exactly what we’re going to do.

But I think it’s important to step back and think about what happened in Libya. Keep in mind that I and Americans took leadership in organizing an international coalition that made sure that we were able to, without putting troops on the ground at the cost of less than what we spent in two weeks in Iraq, liberate a country that had been under the yoke of dictatorship for 40 years. Got rid of a despot who had killed Americans and as a consequence, despite this tragedy, you had tens of thousands of Libyans after the events in Benghazi marching and saying America is our friend. We stand with them.

OBAMA: Now that represents the opportunity we have to take advantage of. And, you know, Governor Romney, I’m glad that you agree that we have been successful in going after Al Qaida, but I have to tell you that, you know, your strategy previously has been one that has been all over the map and is not designed to keep Americans safe or to build on the opportunities that exist in the Middle East.



Transcript of the Third Round of the Obama-Romney Presidential Debate, October 22, 2012.....Part 3

ROMNEY: Well, my strategy is pretty straightforward, which is to go after the bad guys, to make sure we do our very best to interrupt them, to -- to kill them, to take them out of the picture.

But my strategy is broader than that. That’s -- that’s important, of course. But the key that we’re going to have to pursue is a -- is a pathway to get the Muslim world to be able to reject extremism on its own.

We don’t want another Iraq, we don’t want another Afghanistan. That’s not the right course for us. The right course for us is to make sure that we go after the -- the people who are leaders of these various anti-American groups and these -- these jihadists, but also help the Muslim world.

And how do we do that? A group of Arab scholars came together, organized by the U.N., to look at how we can help the -- the world reject these -- these terrorists. And the answer they came up with was this:

One, more economic development. We should key our foreign aid, our direct foreign investment, and that of our friends, we should coordinate it to make sure that we -- we push back and give them more economic development.

Number two, better education.

Number three, gender equality.

Number four, the rule of law. We have to help these nations create civil societies.

But what’s been happening over the last couple of years is, as we’ve watched this tumult in the Middle East, this rising tide of chaos occur, you see Al Qaida rushing in, you see other jihadist groups rushing in. And -- and they’re throughout many nations in the Middle East.

ROMNEY: It’s wonderful that Libya seems to be making some progress, despite this terrible tragedy.

But next door, of course, we have Egypt. Libya’s 6 million population; Egypt, 80 million population. We want -- we want to make sure that we’re seeing progress throughout the Middle East. With Mali now having North Mali taken over by Al Qaida; with Syria having Assad continuing to -- to kill, to murder his own people, this is a region in tumult.

And, of course, Iran on the path to a nuclear weapon, we’ve got real (inaudible).

SCHIEFFER: We’ll get to that, but let’s give the president a chance.

OBAMA: Governor Romney, I’m glad that you recognize that Al Qaida is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia, not Al Qaida; you said Russia, in the 1980s, they’re now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.

But Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s.

You say that you’re not interested in duplicating what happened in Iraq. But just a few weeks ago, you said you think we should have more troops in Iraq right now. And the -- the challenge we have -- I know you haven’t been in a position to actually execute foreign policy -- but every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong. You said we should have gone into Iraq, despite that fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction.


Transcript of the Third Obama-Romney Presidential Debate....October 22, 2012....Part 4....

You said that we should still have troops in Iraq to this day. You indicated that we shouldn’t be passing nuclear treaties with Russia despite the fact that 71 senators, Democrats and Republicans, voted for it. You said that, first, we should not have a timeline in Afghanistan. Then you said we should. Now you say maybe or it depends, which means not only were you wrong, but you were also confusing in sending mixed messages both to our troops and our allies.

OBAMA: So, what -- what we need to do with respect to the Middle East is strong, steady leadership, not wrong and reckless leadership that is all over the map. And unfortunately, that’s the kind of opinions that you’ve offered throughout this campaign, and it is not a recipe for American strength, or keeping America safe over the long haul.

SCHIEFFER: I’m going to add a couple of minutes here to give you a chance to respond.

ROMNEY: Well, of course I don’t concur with what the president said about my own record and the things that I’ve said. They don’t happen to be accurate. But -- but I can say this, that we’re talking about the Middle East and how to help the Middle East reject the kind of terrorism we’re seeing, and the rising tide of tumult and -- and confusion. And -- and attacking me is not an agenda. Attacking me is not talking about how we’re going to deal with the challenges that exist in the Middle East, and take advantage of the opportunity there, and stem the tide of this violence.

But I’ll respond to a couple of things that you mentioned. First of all, Russia I indicated is a geopolitical foe. Not...

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: Excuse me. It’s a geopolitical foe, and I said in the same -- in the same paragraph I said, and Iran is the greatest national security threat we face. Russia does continue to battle us in the U.N. time and time again. I have clear eyes on this. I’m not going to wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to Russia, or Mr. Putin. And I’m certainly not going to say to him, I’ll give you more flexibility after the election. After the election, he’ll get more backbone. Number two, with regards to Iraq, you and I agreed I believe that there should be a status of forces agreement.

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: Oh you didn’t? You didn’t want a status of...

OBAMA: What I would not have had done was left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. And that certainly would not help us in the Middle East.

ROMNEY: I’m sorry, you actually -- there was a -- there was an effort on the part of the president to have a status of forces agreement, and I concurred in that, and said that we should have some number of troops that stayed on. That was something I concurred with...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Governor...

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: ...that your posture. That was my posture as well. You thought it should have been 5,000 troops...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Governor?

ROMNEY: ... I thought there should have been more troops, but you know what? The answer was we got...

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: ... no troops through whatsoever.

OBAMA: This was just a few weeks ago that you indicated that we should still have troops in Iraq.


Transcript of the Third Obama-Romney Presidential Debate...October 22, 2012.....Part 5......

ROMNEY: No, I...

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: ...I’m sorry that’s a...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: You -- you...

ROMNEY: ...that’s a -- I indicated...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: ...major speech.

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: ...I indicated that you failed to put in place a status...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Governor?

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: ...of forces agreement at the end of the conflict that existed.

OBAMA: Governor -- here -- here’s -- here’s one thing...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: ...here’s one thing I’ve learned as commander in chief.

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: Let him answer...

OBAMA: You’ve got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean. You just gave a speech a few weeks ago in which you said we should still have troops in Iraq. That is not a recipe for making sure that we are taking advantage of the opportunities and meeting the challenges of the Middle East.

Now, it is absolutely true that we cannot just meet these challenges militarily. And so what I’ve done throughout my presidency and will continue to do is, number one, make sure that these countries are supporting our counterterrorism efforts.

Number two, make sure that they are standing by our interests in Israel’s security, because it is a true friend and our greatest ally in the region.

Number three, we do have to make sure that we’re protecting religious minorities and women because these countries can’t develop unless all the population, not just half of it, is developing.

Number four, we do have to develop their economic -- their economic capabilities.

But number five, the other thing that we have to do is recognize that we can’t continue to do nation building in these regions. Part of American leadership is making sure that we’re doing nation building here at home. That will help us maintain the kind of American leadership that we need.

SCHIEFFER: Let me interject the second topic question in this segment about the Middle East and so on, and that is, you both mentioned -- alluded to this, and that is Syria.

The war in Syria has now spilled over into Lebanon. We have, what, more than 100 people that were killed there in a bomb. There were demonstrations there, eight people dead.

Mr. President, it’s been more than a year since you saw -- you told Assad he had to go. Since then, 30,000 Syrians have died. We’ve had 300,000 refugees.

The war goes on. He’s still there. Should we reassess our policy and see if we can find a better way to influence events there? Or is that even possible?

And you go first, sir.

OBAMA: What we’ve done is organize the international community, saying Assad has to go. We’ve mobilized sanctions against that government. We have made sure that they are isolated. We have provided humanitarian assistance and we are helping the opposition organize, and we’re particularly interested in making sure that we’re mobilizing the moderate forces inside of Syria.

But ultimately, Syrians are going to have to determine their own future. And so everything we’re doing, we’re doing in consultation with our partners in the region, including Israel which obviously has a huge interest in seeing what happens in Syria; coordinating with Turkey and other countries in the region that have a great interest in this.

This -- what we’re seeing taking place in Syria is heartbreaking, and that’s why we are going to do everything we can to make sure that we are helping the opposition. But we also have to recognize that, you know, for us to get more entangled militarily in Syria is a serious step, and we have to do so making absolutely certain that we know who we are helping; that we’re not putting arms in the hands of folks who eventually could turn them against us or allies in the region.

And I am confident that Assad’s days are numbered. But what we can’t do is to simply suggest that, as Governor Romney at times has suggested, that giving heavy weapons, for example, to the Syrian opposition is a simple proposition that would lead us to be safer over the long term. SCHIEFFER: Governor?

ROMNEY: Well, let’s step back and talk about what’s happening in Syria and how important it is. First of all, 30,000 people being killed by their government is a humanitarian disaster. Secondly, Syria is an opportunity for us because Syria plays an important role in the Middle East, particularly right now.

ROMNEY: Syria is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world. It’s their route to the sea. It’s the route for them to arm Hezbollah in Lebanon, which threatens, of course, our ally, Israel. And so seeing Syria remove Assad is a very high priority for us. Number two, seeing a -- a replacement government being responsible people is critical for us. And finally, we don’t want to have military involvement there. We don’t want to get drawn into a military conflict.

And so the right course for us, is working through our partners and with our own resources, to identify responsible parties within Syria, organize them, bring them together in a -- in a form of -- if not government, a form of -- of -- of council that can take the lead in Syria. And then make sure they have the arms necessary to defend themselves. We do need to make sure that they don’t have arms that get into the -- the wrong hands. Those arms could be used to hurt us down the road. We need to make sure as well that we coordinate this effort with our allies, and particularly with -- with Israel.

But the Saudi’s and the Qatari, and -- and the Turks are all very concerned about this. They’re willing to work with us. We need to have a very effective leadership effort in Syria, making sure that the -- the insurgent there are armed and that the insurgents that become armed, are people who will be the responsible parties. Recognize -- I believe that Assad must go. I believe he will go. But I believe -- we want to make sure that we have the relationships of friendship with the people that take his place, steps that in the years to come we see Syria as a -- as a friend, and Syria as a responsible party in the Middle East.

This -- this is a critical opportunity for America. And what I’m afraid of is we’ve watched over the past year or so, first the president saying, well we’ll let the U.N. deal with it. And Assad -- excuse me, Kofi Annan came in and said we’re going to try to have a ceasefire. That didn’t work. Then it went to the Russians and said, let’s see if you can do something. We should be playing the leadership role there, not on the ground with military.

SCHIEFFER: All right.

ROMNEY: ...by the leadership role.

OBAMA: We are playing the leadership role. We organized the Friends of Syria. We are mobilizing humanitarian support, and support for the opposition. And we are making sure that those we help are those who will be friends of ours in the long term and friends of our allies in the region over the long term. But going back to Libya -- because this is an example of how we make choices. When we went in to Libya, and we were able to immediately stop the massacre there, because of the unique circumstances and the coalition that we had helped to organize. We also had to make sure that Moammar Gadhafi didn’t stay there.

And to the governor’s credit, you supported us going into Libya and the coalition that we organized. But when it came time to making sure that Gadhafi did not stay in power, that he was captured, Governor, your suggestion was that this was mission creep, that this was mission muddle.

Imagine if we had pulled out at that point. You know, Moammar Gadhafi had more American blood on his hands than any individual other than Osama bin Laden. And so we were going to make sure that we finished the job. That’s part of the reason why the Libyans stand with us.

But we did so in a careful, thoughtful way, making certain that we knew who we were dealing with, that those forces of moderation on the ground were ones that we could work with, and we have to take the same kind of steady, thoughtful leadership when it comes to Syria. That’s exactly what we’re doing.

SCHIEFFER: Governor, can I just ask you, would you go beyond what the administration would do, like for example, would you put in no-fly zones over Syria?

ROMNEY: I don’t want to have our military involved in Syria. I don’t think there is a necessity to put our military in Syria at this stage. I don’t anticipate that in the future.

As I indicated, our objectives are to replace Assad and to have in place a new government which is friendly to us, a responsible government, if possible. And I want to make sure they get armed and they have the arms necessary to defend themselves, but also to remove -- to remove Assad.

But I do not want to see a military involvement on the part of our -- of our troops.

SCHIEFFER: Well --

ROMNEY: And this isn’t -- this isn’t going to be necessary.

We -- we have, with our partners in the region, we have sufficient resources to support those groups. But look, this has been going on for a year. This is a time -- this should have been a time for American leadership. We should have taken a leading role, not militarily, but a leading role organizationally, governmentally to bring together the parties; to find responsible parties.

As you hear from intelligence sources even today, the -- the insurgents are highly disparate. They haven’t come together. They haven’t formed a unity group, a council of some kind. That needs to happen. America can help that happen. And we need to make sure they have the arms they need to carry out the very important role which is getting rid of Assad.

SCHIEFFER: Can we get a quick response, Mr. President, because I want to...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Well, I’ll -- I’ll be very quick. What you just heard Governor Romney said is he doesn’t have different ideas. And that’s because we’re doing exactly what we should be doing to try to promote a moderate Syrian leadership and a -- an effective transition so that we get Assad out. That’s the kind of leadership we’ve shown. That’s the kind of leadership we’ll continue to show.

SCHIEFFER: May I ask you, you know, during the Egyptian turmoil, there came a point when you said it was time for President Mubarak to go.

OBAMA: Right.

SCHIEFFER: Some in your administration thought perhaps we should have waited a while on that. Do you have any regrets about that?

OBAMA: No, I don’t, because I think that America has to stand with democracy. The notion that we would have tanks run over those young people who were in Tahrir Square, that is not the kind of American leadership that John F. Kennedy talked about 50 years ago.

But what I’ve also said is that now that you have a democratically elected government in Egypt, that they have to make sure that they take responsibility for protecting religious minorities. And we have put significant pressure on them to make sure they’re doing that; to recognize the rights of women, which is critical throughout the region. These countries can’t develop if young women are not given the kind of education that they need.

They have to abide by their treaty with Israel. That is a red line for us, because not only is Israel’s security at stake, but our security is at stake if that unravels.

They have to make sure that they’re cooperating with us when it comes to counterterrorism.

And we will help them with respect to developing their own economy, because ultimately what’s going to make the Egyptian revolution successful for the people of Egypt, but also for the world, is if those young people who gathered there are seeing opportunities.

Their aspirations are similar to young people’s here. They want jobs, they want to be able to make sure their kids are going to a good school. They want to make sure that they have a roof over their heads and that they have the prospects of a better life in the future.

And so one of the things that we’ve been doing is, is, for example, organizing entrepreneurship conferences with these Egyptians to give them a sense of how they can start rebuilding their economy in a way that’s noncorrupt, that’s transparent. But what is also important for us to understand is, is that for America to be successful in this region there’s some things that we’re going to have to do here at home as well.

You know, one of the challenges over the last decade is we’ve done experiments in nation building in places like Iraq and Afghanistan and we’ve neglected, for example, developing our own economy, our own energy sectors, our own education system. And it’s very hard for us to project leadership around the world when we’re not doing what we need to do...

SCHIEFFER: Governor Romney, I want to hear your response to that, but I would just ask you, would you have stuck with Mubarak?

ROMNEY: No. I believe, as the president indicated, and said at the time that I supported his -- his action there. I felt that -- I wish we’d have had a better vision of the future.

I wish that, looking back at the beginning of the president’s term and even further back than that, that we’d have recognized that there was a growing energy and passion for freedom in that part of the world, and that we would have worked more aggressively with our friend and with other friends in the region to have them make the transition towards a more representative form of government, such that it didn’t explode in the way that it did.

But once it exploded, I felt the same as the president did, which is these freedom voices and the streets of Egypt, where the people who were speaking of our principles and the President Mubarak had done things which were unimaginable and the idea of him crushing his people was not something that we could possibly support.

Let me step back and talk about what I think our mission has to be in the Middle East and even more broadly, because our purpose is to make sure the world is more -- is peaceful. We want a peaceful planet. We want people to be able to enjoy their lives and know they’re going to have a bright and prosperous future, not be at war. That’s our purpose.

And the mantle of leadership for the -- promoting the principles of peace has fallen to America. We didn’t ask for it. But it’s an honor that we have it.

But for us to be able to promote those principles of peace requires us to be strong. And that begins with a strong economy here at home. Unfortunately, the economy is not stronger. When the -- when the president of Iraq -- excuse me, of Iran, Ahmadinejad, says that our debt makes us not a great country, that’s a frightening thing.

Former chief of the -- Joint Chiefs of Staff said that -- Admiral Mullen said that our debt is the biggest national security threat we face. This -- we have weakened our economy. We need a strong economy.

We need to have as well a strong military. Our military is second to none in the world. We’re blessed with terrific soldiers, and extraordinary technology and intelligence. But the idea of a trillion dollar in cuts through sequestration and budget cuts to the military would change that. We need to have strong allies. Our association and connection with our allies is essential to America’s strength. We’re the great nation that has allies, 42 allies and friends around the world.

ROMNEY: And, finally, we have to stand by our principles. And if we’re strong in each of those things, American influence will grow. But unfortunately, in nowhere in the world is America’s influence will grow. But unfortunately, in -- nowhere in the world is America’s influence greater today than it was four years ago.

SCHIEFFER: All right.

ROMNEY: And that’s because we’ve become weaker in each of those four...

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: ...you’re going to get a chance to respond to that, because that’s a perfect segue into our next segment, and that is, what is America’s role in the world? And that is the question. What do each of you see as our role in the world, and I believe, Governor Romney, it’s your chance to go first.

ROMNEY: Well I -- I absolutely believe that America has a -- a responsibility, and the privilege of helping defend freedom and promote the principles that -- that make the world more peaceful. And those principles include human rights, human dignity, free enterprise, freedom of expression, elections. Because when there are elections, people tend to vote for peace. They don’t vote for war. So we want to promote those principles around the world. We recognize that there are places of conflict in the world.

We want to end those conflicts to the extent humanly possible. But in order to be able to fulfill our role in the world, America must be strong. America must lead. And for that to happen, we have to strengthen our economy here at home. You can’t have 23 million people struggling to get a job. You can’t have an economy that over the last three years keeps slowing down its growth rate. You can’t have kids coming out of college, half of them can’t find a job today, or a job that’s commensurate with their college degree. We have to get our economy going.

And our military, we’ve got to strengthen our military long-term. We don’t know what the world is going to throw at us down the road. We -- we make decisions today in the military that -- that will confront challenges we can’t imagine. In the 2000 debates, there was no mention of terrorism, for instance. And a year later, 9/11 happened. So, we have to make decisions based upon uncertainty, and that means a strong military. I will not cut our military budget. We have to also stand by our allies. I -- I think the tension that existed between Israel and the United States was very unfortunate.

I think also that pulling our missile defense program out of Poland in the way we did was also unfortunate in terms of, if you will, disrupting the relationship in some ways that existed between us.

And then, of course, with regards to standing for our principles, when -- when the students took to the streets in Tehran and the people there protested, the Green Revolution occurred, for the president to be silent I thought was an enormous mistake. We have to stand for our principles, stand for our allies, stand for a strong military and stand for a stronger economy.

SCHIEFFER: Mr. President?

OBAMA: America remains the one indispensable nation. And the world needs a strong America, and it is stronger now than when I came into office.

Because we ended the war in Iraq, we were able to refocus our attention on not only the terrorist threat, but also beginning a transition process in Afghanistan.

It also allowed us to refocus on alliances and relationships that had been neglected for a decade.

And Governor Romney, our alliances have never been stronger, in Asia, in Europe, in Africa, with Israel, where we have unprecedented military and intelligence cooperation, including dealing with the Iranian threat.

But what we also have been able to do is position ourselves so we can start rebuilding America, and that’s what my plan does. Making sure that we’re bringing manufacturing back to our shores so that we’re creating jobs here, as we’ve done with the auto industry, not rewarding companies that are shipping jobs overseas.

Making sure that we’ve got the best education system in the world, including retraining our workers for the jobs of tomorrow.

Doing everything we can to control our own energy. We’ve cut our oil imports to the lowest level in two decades because we’ve developed oil and natural gas. But we also have to develop clean energy technologies that will allow us to cut our exports in half by 2020. That’s the kind of leadership that we need to show.

And we’ve got to make sure that we reduce our deficit. Unfortunately, Governor Romney’s plan doesn’t do it. We’ve got to do it in a responsible way by cutting out spending we don’t need, but also asking the wealthiest to pay a little bit more. That way we can invest in the research and technology that’s always kept us at the cutting edge.

Now, Governor Romney has taken a different approach throughout this campaign. Both at home and abroad, he has proposed wrong and reckless policies. He’s praised George Bush as a good economic steward and Dick Cheney as somebody who’s -- who shows great wisdom and judgment. And taking us back to those kinds of strategies that got us into this mess are not the way that we are going to maintain leadership in the 21st century.

SCHIEFFER: Governor Romney, “wrong and reckless” policies?

ROMNEY: I’ve got a policy for the future and agenda for the future. And when it comes to our economy here at home, I know what it takes to create 12 million new jobs and rising take-home pay. And what we’ve seen over the last four years is something I don’t want to see over the next four years.


Transcript of the Third Obama-Romney Debate, October 22, 2012......Part 6

The president said by now we’d be a 5.4 percent unemployment. We’re 9 million jobs short of that. I will get America working again and see rising take-home pay again, and I’ll do it with five simple steps. Number one, we are going to have North American energy independence. We’re going to do it by taking full advantage of oil, coal, gas, nuclear and our renewables.

Number two, we’re going to increase our trade. Trade grows about 12 percent year. It doubles about every -- every five or so years. We can do better than that, particularly in Latin America. The opportunities for us in Latin America we have just not taken advantage of fully. As a matter of fact, Latin America’s economy is almost as big as the economy of China. We’re all focused on China. Latin America is a huge opportunity for us -- time zone, language opportunities.

Number three, we’re going to have to have training programs that work for our workers and schools that finally put the parents and the teachers and the kids first, and the teachers’ unions going to have to go behind.

And then we’re going to have to get to a balanced budget. We can’t expect entrepreneurs and businesses large and small to take their life savings or their company’s money and invest in America if they think we’re headed to the road to Greece. And that’s where we’re going right now unless we finally get off this spending and borrowing binge. And I’ll get us on track to a balanced budget.

And finally, number five, we’ve got to champion small business. Small business is where jobs come from. Two-thirds of our jobs come from small businesses. New business formation is down to the lowest level in 30 years under this administration. I want to bring it back and get back good jobs and rising take-home pay.

OBAMA: Well, let’s talk about what we need to compete. First of all, Governor Romney talks about small businesses. But, Governor, when you were in Massachusetts, small businesses development ranked about 48th, I think out of 50 states in Massachusetts, because the policies that you are promoting actually don’t help small businesses.

And the way you define small businesses includes folks at the very top. And they include you and me. That’s not the kind of small business promotion we need. But let’s take an example that we know is going to make a difference in the 21st century and that’s our education policy. We didn’t have a lot of chance to talk about this in the last debate.

You know, under my leadership, what we’ve done is reformed education, working with governors, 46 states. We’ve seen progress and gains in schools that were having a terrible time. And they’re starting to finally make progress.

And what I now want to do is to hire more teachers, especially in math and science, because we know that we’ve fallen behind when it comes to math and science. And those teachers can make a difference.

Now, Governor Romney, when you were asked by teachers whether or not this would help the economy grow, you said this isn’t going to help the economy grow.

OBAMA: When you were asked about reduced class sizes, you said class sizes don’t make a difference.

But I tell you, if you talk to teachers, they will tell you it does make a difference. And if we’ve got math teachers who are able to provide the kind of support that they need for our kids, that’s what’s going to determine whether or not the new businesses are created here. Companies are going to locate here depending on whether we’ve got the most highly skilled workforce.

And the kinds of budget proposals that you’ve put forward, when we don’t ask either you or me to pay a dime more in terms of reducing the deficit, but instead we slash support for education, that’s undermining our long-term competitiveness. That is not good for America’s position in the world, and the world notices.

SCHIEFFER: Let me get back to foreign policy.

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: Can I just get back...

ROMNEY: Well -- well, I need to speak a moment...

SCHIEFFER: OK.

ROMNEY: ... if you’ll let me, Bob, just about education...

SCHIEFFER: OK.

ROMNEY: ... because I’m -- I’m so proud of the state that I had the chance to be governor of.

We have every two years tests that look at how well our kids are doing. Fourth graders and eighth graders are tested in English and math. While I was governor, I was proud that our fourth graders came out number one of all 50 states in English, and then also in math. And our eighth graders number one in English and also in math. First time one state had been number one in all four measures.

How did we do that? Well, Republicans and Democrats came together on a bipartisan basis to put in place education principles that focused on having great teachers in the classroom.

OBAMA: Ten years earlier...

ROMNEY: And that was -- that was -- that was what allowed us to become the number one state in the nation.

OBAMA: But that was 10 years before you took office.

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEY: And then you cut education spending when you came into office.

ROMNEY: The first -- the first -- the first -- and we kept our schools number one in the nation. They’re still number one today.

SCHIEFFER: All right.

ROMNEY: And the principles that we put in place, we also gave kids not just a graduation exam that determined whether they were up to the skills needed to -- to be able compete, but also if they graduated the quarter of their class, they got a four-year tuition- free ride at any Massachusetts public institution of higher learning.

OBAMA: That happened before you came into office.

SCHIEFFER: Governor...

ROMNEY: That was actually mine, actually, Mr. President. You got that fact wrong.

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: Let me get -- I want to try to shift it, because we have heard some of this in the other debates.

Governor, you say you want a bigger military. You want a bigger Navy. You don’t want to cut defense spending. What I want to ask you -- we were talking about financial problems in this country. Where are you going to get the money?

ROMNEY: Well, let’s come back and talk about the military, but all the way -- all the way through. First of all, I’m going through from the very beginning -- we’re going to cut about 5 percent of the discretionary budget, excluding military. That’s number one.

SCHIEFFER: But can you do this without driving deeper...

(CROSSTALK)

ROMNEHY: The good news is (inaudible). I’d be happy to have you take a look. Come on our website. You look at how we get to a balanced budget within eight to 10 years. We do it by getting -- by reducing spending in a whole series of programs. By the way, number one I get rid of is Obamacare.

There are a number of things that sound good, but frankly, we just can’t afford them. And that one doesn’t sound good and it’s not affordable. So I’d get rid of that one from day one. To the extent humanly possible, we get that out. We take program after program that we don’t absolutely have to have, and we get rid of them.

Number two, we take some programs that we are doing to keep, like Medicaid, which is a program for the poor; we’ll take that healthcare program for the poor and we give it to the states to run because states run these programs more efficiently.

As a governor, I thought please, give me this program. I can run this more efficiently than the federal government and states, by the way, are proving it. States like Arizona, Rhode Island have taken these -- these Medicaid dollars; have shown they can run these programs more cost-effectively. I want to do those two things and get this -- get this to a balanced budget with eight -- eight to 10 years.

But the military -- let’s get back to the military, though.

(CROSSTALK) SCHIEFFER: That’s what I’m trying...

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: He should have answered the first question.

OBAMA: Look, Governor Romney’s called for $5 trillion of tax cuts that he says he’s going to pay for by closing deductions. Now, the math doesn’t work, but he continues to claim that he’s going to do it. He then wants to spend another $2 trillion on military spending that our military is not asking for.

Now, keep in mind that our military spending has gone up every single year that I’ve been in office. We spend more on our military than the next 10 countries combined; China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, you name it. The next 10. And what I did was work with our joint chiefs of staff to think about, what are we going to need in the future to make sure that we are safe?

And that’s the budget that we’ve put forward. But, what you can’t do is spend $2 trillion in additional military spending that the military is not asking for, $5 trillion on tax cuts. You say that you’re going to pay for it by closing loopholes and deductions, without naming what those loopholes and deductions are. And then somehow you’re also going to deal with the deficit that we’ve already got. The math simply doesn’t work. But when it comes to our military, what we have to think about is not, you know just budgets, we’ve got to think about capabilities.

We need to be thinking about cyber security. We need to be talking about space. That’s exactly what our budget does, but it’s driven by strategy. It’s not driven by politics. It’s not driven by members of Congress, and what they would like to see. It’s driven by, what are we going to need to keep the American people safe? That’s exactly what our budget does, and it also then allows us to reduce our deficit, which is a significant national security concern. Because we’ve got to make sure that our economy is strong at home so that we can project military power overseas.



Transcript of the Third Obama-Romney Debate, October 22, 2012......Part 7.....

ROMNEY: I’m pleased that I’ve balanced budgets. I was on the world of business for 25 years. If you didn’t balance your budget, you went out of business. I went into the Olympics that was out of balance, and we got it on balance, and made a success there. I had the chance to be governor of a state. Four years in a row, Democrats and Republicans came together to balance the budget. We cut taxes 19 times and balanced our budget. The president hasn’t balanced a budget yet. I expect to have the opportunity to do so myself.

SCHIEFFER: All right.

ROMNEY: I’m going to be able to balance the budget.

Let’s talk about military spending, and that’s this.

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: Thirty seconds.

ROMNEY: Our Navy is old -- excuse me, our Navy is smaller now than at any time since 1917. The Navy said they needed 313 ships to carry out their mission. We’re now at under 285. We’re headed down to the low 200s if we go through a sequestration. That’s unacceptable to me.

I want to make sure that we have the ships that are required by our Navy. Our Air Force is older and smaller than at any time since it was founded in 1947.

We’ve changed for the first time since FDR -- since FDR we had the -- we’ve always had the strategy of saying we could fight in two conflicts at once. Now we’re changing to one conflict. Look, this, in my view, is the highest responsibility of the President of the United States, which is to maintain the safety of the American people.

And I will not cut our military budget by a trillion dollars, which is a combination of the budget cuts the president has, as well as the sequestration cuts. That, in my view, is making -- is making our future less certain and less secure.

OBAMA: Bob, I just need to comment on this.

First of all, the sequester is not something that I’ve proposed. It is something that Congress has proposed. It will not happen.

The budget that we are talking about is not reducing our military spending. It is maintaining it.

But I think Governor Romney maybe hasn’t spent enough time looking at how our military works.

You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military’s changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.

OBAMA: And so the question is not a game of Battleship, where we’re counting slips. It’s what are our capabilities. And so when I sit down with the Secretary of the Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we determine how are we going to be best able to meet all of our defense needs in a way that also keeps faith with our troops, that also makes sure that our veterans have the kind of support that they need when they come home.

OBAMA: And that is not reflected in the kind of budget that you’re putting forward because it just doesn’t work.

SCHIEFFER: All right.

OBAMA: And, you know, we visited the website quite a bit and it still doesn’t work.

SCHIEFFER: A lot to cover. I’d like -- I’d like to move to the next segment: red lines, Israel and Iran.

Would either of you -- and you’ll have two minutes -- and, President Obama, you have the first go at this one -- would either of you be willing to declare that an attack on Israel is an attack on the United States, which, of course, is the same promise that we give to our close allies like Japan.

And if you made such a declaration, would not that deter Iran? It’s certainly deterred the Soviet Union for a long, long time when we made that -- we made -- we made that promise to our allies.

Mr. President?

OBAMA: First of all, Israel is a true friend. It is our greatest ally in the region. And if Israel is attacked, America will stand with Israel. I’ve made that clear throughout my presidency. And...

SCHIEFFER: So you’re -- you’re saying we’ve already made that declaration.

OBAMA: I will stand with Israel if they are attacked. And this is the reason why, working with Israel, we have created the strongest military and intelligence cooperation between our two countries in history.

In fact, this week we’ll be carrying out the largest military exercise with Israel in history, this very week. But to the issue of Iran, as long as I’m president of the United States Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. I made that clear when I came into office.

OBAMA: We then organized the strongest coalition and the strongest sanctions against Iran in history, and it is crippling their economy. Their currency has dropped 80 percent. Their oil production has plunged to the lowest level since they were fighting a war with Iraq 20 years ago. So their economy is in a shambles.

And the reason we did this is because a nuclear Iran is a threat to our national security, and it is a threat to Israel’s national security. We cannot afford to have a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region of the world.

Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. And for them to be able to provide nuclear technology to non-state actors, that’s unacceptable. And they have said that they want to see Israel wiped off the map.

So the work that we’ve done with respect to sanctions now offers Iran a choice. They can take the diplomatic route and end their nuclear program or they will have to face a united world and a United States president, me, who said we’re not going to take any options off the table.

The disagreement I have with Governor Romney is that, during the course of this campaign, he’s often talked as if we should take premature military action. I think that would be a mistake, because when I’ve sent young men and women into harm’s way, I always understand that that is the last resort, not the first resort.

SCHIEFFER: Two minutes.

ROMNEY: Well, first of all, I want to underscore the same point the president mad,e which is that if I’m President of the United States, when I’m President of the United States, we will stand with Israel.

And if Israel is attacked, we have their back, not just diplomatically, not just culturally, but militarily. That’s number one.

Number two, with regards to Iran and the threat of Iran, there’s no question but that a nuclear Iran, a nuclear-capable Iran is unacceptable to America. It presents a threat not only to our friends but ultimately a threat to us to have Iran have nuclear material, nuclear weapons that could be used against us or used to be threatening to us.

ROMNEY: It is also essential for us to understand what our mission is in Iran, and that is to dissuade Iran from having a nuclear weapon through peaceful and diplomatic means. And crippling sanctions are something I called for five years ago, when I was in Israel, speaking at the Herzliya Conference. I laid out seven steps, crippling sanctions were number one. And they do work. You’re seeing it right now in the economy. It’s absolutely the right thing to do, to have crippling sanctions. I would have put them in place earlier. But it’s good that we have them.

Number two, something I would add today is I would tighten those sanctions. I would say that ships that carry Iranian oil, can’t come into our ports. I imagine the E.U. would agree with us as well. Not only ships couldn’t, but I’d say companies that are moving their oil can’t, people who are trading in their oil can’t. I would tighten those sanctions further. Secondly, I’d take on diplomatic isolation efforts. I’d make sure that Ahmadinejad is indicted under the Genocide Convention. His words amount to genocide incitation. I would indict him for it. I would also make sure that their diplomats are treated like the pariah they are around the world. The same way we treated the apartheid diplomats of South Africa.

We need to increase pressure time, and time again on Iran because anything other than a -- a -- a solution to this, which says -- which stops this -- this nuclear folly of theirs, is unacceptable to America. And of course, a military action is the last resort. It is something one would only - only consider if all of the other avenues had been -- had been tried to their full extent.

SCHIEFFER: Let me ask both of you, there -- as you know, there are reports that Iran and the United States a part of an international group, have agreed in principle to talks about Iran’s nuclear program. What is the deal, if there are such talks? What is the deal that you would accept, Mr. President?

OBAMA: Well, first of all those are reports in the newspaper. They are not true. But our goal is to get Iran to recognize it needs to give up its nuclear program and abide by the U.N. resolutions that have been in place. Because they have the opportunity to reenter the community of nations, and we would welcome that.

There -- there are people in Iran who have the same aspirations as people all around the world for a better life. And we hope that their leadership takes the right decision, but the deal we’ll accept is they end their nuclear program. It’s very straightforward. And I’m glad that Governor Romney agrees with the steps that we’re taking. You know, there have been times, Governor, frankly, during the course of this campaign, where it sounded like you thought that you’d do the same things we did, but you’d say them louder and somehow that -- that would make a difference.

And it turns out that the work involved in setting up these crippling sanctions is painstaking. It’s meticulous. We started from the day we got into office. And the reason is was so important -- and this is a testament to how we’ve restored American credibility and strength around the world -- is we had to make sure that all the countries participated, even countries like Russia and China. Because if it’s just us that are imposing sanctions -- we’ve had sanctions in place a long time. It’s because we got everybody to agree that Iran is seeing so much pressure. And we’ve got to maintain that pressure.

There is a deal to be had, and that is that they abide by the rules that have already been established. They convince the international community they are not pursuing a nuclear program. There are inspections that are very intrusive. But over time, what they can do is regain credibility. In the meantime, though, we’re not going to let up the pressure until we have clear evidence that that takes place.

And one last thing -- just -- just to make this point. The clock is ticking. We’re not going to allow Iran to perpetually engage in negotiations that lead nowhere. And I’ve been very clear to them. You know, because of the intelligence coordination that we do with a range of countries, including Israel, we have a sense of when they would get breakout capacity, which means that we would not be able to intervene in time to stop their nuclear program.

And that clock is ticking. And we’re going to make sure that if they do not meet the demands of the international community, then we are going to take all options necessary to make sure they don’t have a nuclear weapon.

SCHIEFFER: Governor?

ROMNEY: I think from the very beginning, one of the challenges we’ve had with Iran is that they have looked at this administration, and felt that the administration was not as strong as it needed to be.

I think they saw weakness where they had expected to find American strength. And I say that because from the very beginning, the president in his campaign four years ago, said he would meet with all the world’s worst actors in his first year, he’d sit down with Chavez and Kim Jong-il, with Castro and President Ahmadinejad of Iran.

And I think they looked and thought, well, that’s an unusual honor to receive from the President of the United States. And then the president began what I have called an apology tour, of going to various nations in the Middle East and criticizing America. I think they looked at that and saw weakness.

Then when there were dissidents in the streets of Tehran, a Green Revolution, holding signs saying, is America with us, the president was silent. I think they noticed that as well.

And I think that when the president said he was going to create daylight between ourselves and Israel, that they noticed that as well.

All of these things suggested, I think, to the Iranian mullahs that, hey, you know, we can keep on pushing along here, we can keep talks going on, we’re just going to keep on spinning centrifuges.

Now there are some 10,000 centrifuges spinning uranium, preparing to create a nuclear threat to the United States and to the world. That’s unacceptable for us, and it’s essential for a president to show strength from the very beginning, to make it very clear what is acceptable and not acceptable.

And an Iranian nuclear program is not acceptable to us. They must not develop nuclear capability. And the way to make sure they understand that is by having, from the very beginning, the tightest sanctions possible. They need to be tightened. Our diplomatic isolation needs to be tougher. We need to indict Ahmadinejad. We need to put the pressure on them as hard as we possibly can, because if we do that, we won’t have to take the military action.

OBAMA: Bob, let me just respond.

Nothing Governor Romney just said is true, starting with this notion of me apologizing. This has been probably the biggest whopper that’s been told during the course of this campaign. And every fact checker and every reporter who’s looked at it, Governor, has said this is not true.

And when it comes to tightening sanctions, look, as I said before, we’ve put in the toughest, most crippling sanctions ever. And the fact is, while we were coordinating an international coalition to make sure these sanctions were effective, you were still invested in a Chinese state oil company that was doing business with the Iranian oil sector.

So I’ll let the American people decide, judge, who’s going to be more effective and more credible when it comes to imposing crippling sanctions.

And with respect to our attitude about the Iranian revolution, I was very clear about the murderous activities that had taken place and that was contrary to international law and everything that civilized people stand for.

And -- and so the strength that we have shown in Iran is shown by the fact that we’ve been able to mobilize the world.

When I came into office, the world was divided. Iran was resurgent. Iran is at its weakest point, economically, strategically, militarily, then since -- then in many years. And we are going to continue to keep the pressure on to make sure that they do not get a nuclear weapon. That’s in America’s national interest and that will be the case so long as I’m president.

ROMNEY: We’re four years closer to a nuclear Iran. We’re four years closer to a nuclear Iran. And -- and -- we should not have wasted these four years to the extent they -- they continue to be able to spin these centrifuges and get that much closer. That’s number one.

Number two, Mr. President, the reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the Middle East and you flew to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to Turkey and Iraq. And by the way, you skipped Israel, our closest friend in the region, but you went to the other nations.

And by the way, they noticed that you skipped Israel. And then in those nations, and on Arabic TV, you said that America had been dismissive and derisive. You said that on occasion America had dictated to other nations.

Mr. President, America has not dictated to other nations. We have freed other nations from dictators.

OBAMA: Bob, let me -- let me respond.

If we’re going to talk about trips that we’ve taken -- when I was a candidate for office, first trip I took was to visit our troops. And when I went to Israel as a candidate, I didn’t take donors. I didn’t attend fundraisers. I went to Yad Beshef (ph), the Holocaust museum there, to remind myself the nature of evil and why our bond with Israel will be unbreakable.

And then I went down to the border towns of Storok (ph), which had experienced missiles raining dowm from Hamas. And I saw families there who showed me there where missiles had come down near their children’s bedrooms. And I was reminded of what that would mean if those were my kids. Which is why as president, we funded an Iron Dome program to stop those missiles.

OBAMA: So that’s how I’ve used my travels, when I travel to Israel and when I travel to the region. And the -- the central question at this point is going to be: Who is going to be credible to all parties involved? And they can look at my track record, whether it’s Iran sanctions, whether it’s dealing with counterterrorism, whether it’s supporting democracy, whether it’s supporting women’s rights, whether it’s supporting religious minorities.

And they can say that the President of the United States and the United States of America has stood on the right side of history. And that kind of credibility is precisely why we’ve been able to show leadership on a wide range of issues facing the world right now.

SCHIEFFER: What if -- what if the prime minister of Israel called you on the phone and said, “Our bombers are on the way. We’re going to bomb Iran.”

What do you --

ROMNEY: Bob, let’s not go into hypotheticals of that nature. Our relationship with Israel, my relationship with the prime minister of Israel is such that we would not get a call saying our bombers are on the way, or their fighters are on the way. This is the kind of thing that would have been discussed and thoroughly evaluated well before that kind of --

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: So you’d say it just wouldn’t happen?

That’s --

SCHIEFFER: OK. Let’s see what --

ROMNEY: But let me -- let me come back -- we can come back. Let’s come back to what the president was speaking about, which is what’s happening in the world and the president’s statement that things are going so well.

Look, I look at what’s happening around the world, and i see Iran four years closer to a bomb. I see the Middle East with a rising tide of violence, chaos, tumult. I see jihadists continuing to spread, whether they’re rising or just about the same level, hard to precisely measure, but it’s clear they’re there. They’re very strong.

I see Syria with 30,000 civilians dead, Assad still in power. I see our trade deficit with China, larger than it’s -- growing larger every year, as a matter of fact.

I look around the world and I don’t feel that you see North Korea, continuing to export their nuclear technology, Russia said they’re not going to follow Nunn-Lugar any more. They’re back away from a nuclear proliferation treaty that we had with them.

ROMNEY: I look around the world, I don’t see our influence growing around the world. I see our influence receding, in part because of the failure of the president to deal with our economic challenges at home; in part because of our withdrawal from our commitment to our military in the way I think it ought to be; in part because of the -- the -- the turmoil with Israel.

I mean, the president received a letter from 38 Democrat senators saying the tensions with Israel were a real problem. They asked him, please repair the tension -- Democrat senators -- please repair the tension...

SCHIEFFER: All right.

ROMNEY: ... the damage in his -- in his own party.

OBAMA: Governor, the problem is, is that on a whole range of issues, whether it’s the Middle East, whether it’s Afghanistan, whether it’s Iraq, whether it’s now Iran, you’ve been all over the map.

I mean, I’m -- I’m pleased that you now are endorsing our policy of applying diplomatic pressure and potentially having bilateral discussions with the Iranians to end their nuclear program. But just a few years ago you said that’s something you’d never do.

In the same way that you initially opposed a timetable in Afghanistan, now you’re for it, although it depends. In the same way that you say you would have ended the war in Iraq, but recently gave a speech saying that we should have 20,000 more folks in there. The same way that you said that it was mission creep to go after Gadhafi.

When it comes to going after Osama bin Laden, you said, well, any president would make that call. But when you were a candidate in 2008, as I was, and I said if I got bin Laden in our sights I would take that shot, you said we shouldn’t move heaven and earth to get one man.

OBAMA: And you said we should ask Pakistan for permission. And if we had asked Pakistan permission, we would not have gotten him. And it was worth moving heaven and earth to get him.

You know, after we killed bin Laden I was at ground zero for a memorial and talked to a young women who was four years old when 9/11 happened. And the last conversation she had with her father was him calling from the twin towers, saying “Peyton (ph), I love you and I will always watch over you.” And for the next decade, she was haunted by that conversation. And she said to me, “You know, by finally getting bin Laden, that brought some closure to me.”

And when we do things like that -- when we bring those who have harmed us to justice, that sends a message to the world and it tells Peyton (ph) that we did not forget her father. And I make that point because that’s the kind of clarity of leadership, and those decisions are not always popular. Those decisions generally -- generally are not poll-tested. And even some in my own party, including my current vice president, had the same critique as you did.

But what the American people understand is that I look at what we need to get done to keep the American people safe and to move our interests forward, and I make those decisions.

SCHIEFFER: All right, let’s go. And that leads us -- this takes us right to the next segment, Governor, America’s longest war, Afghanistan and Pakistan...

ROMNEY: Bob...

SCHIEFFER: Governor, you get to go first.

ROMNEY: You can’t -- but you can’t have the president just lay out a whole series of items without giving me a chance to respond.

SCHIEFFER: With respect, sir, you had laid out quite a program...

ROMNEY: Well, that’s probably true.

SCHIEFFER: We’ll give you -- we’ll catch up.

The United States is scheduled to turn over responsibility for security in Afghanistan to the Afghan government in 2014. At that point, we will withdraw our combat troops, leave a smaller force of Americans, if I understand our policy, in Afghanistan for training purposes. It seems to me the key question here is: What do you do if the deadline arrives and it is obvious the Afghans are unable to handle their security? Do we still leave?

And I believe, Governor Romney, you go first?

ROMNEY: Well, we’re going to be finished by 2014, and when I’m president, we’ll make sure we bring our troops out by the end of 2014. The commanders and the generals there are on track to do so.

We’ve seen progress over the past several years. The surge has been successful and the training program is proceeding apace. There are now a large number of Afghan Security Forces, 350,000 that are ready to step in to provide security and we’re going to be able to make that transition by the end of 2014.

So our troops will come home at that point.

I can tell you at the same time, that we will make sure that we look at what’s happening in Pakistan, and recognize that what’s happening in Pakistan is going to have a major impact on the success in Afghanistan. And I say that because I know a lot of people that feel like we should just brush our hands and walk away.

And I don’t mean you, Mr. President, but some people in the -- in our nation feel that Pakistan is being nice to us, and that we should walk away fro mthem. But Pakistan is important to the region, to the world and to us, because Pakistan has 100 nuclear warheads and they’re rushing to build a lot more. They’ll have more than Great Britain sometime in the -- in the relatively near future.

They also have the Haqqani Network and the Taliban existent within their country. And so a Pakistan that falls apart, becomes a failed state, would be of extraordinary danger to Afghanistan and to us.

And so we’re going to have to remain helpful in encouraging Pakistan to move towards a more stable government and rebuild the relationship with us. And that means that our aid that we provide to Pakistan is going to have to be conditioned upon certain benchmarks being met.

ROMNEY: So for me, I look at this as both a need to help move Pakistan in the right direction, and also to get Afghanistan to be ready, and they will be ready by the end of 2014.

SCHIEFFER: Mr. President?

OBAMA: When I came into office, we were still bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan had been drifting for a decade. We ended the war in Iraq, refocused our attention on Afghanistan, and we did deliver a surge of troops. That was facilitated in part because we had ended the war in Iraq.

And we are now in a position where we have met many of the objectives that got us there in the first place.

Part of what had happened is we’d forgotten why we had gone. We went because there were people who were responsible for 3,000 American deaths. And so we decimated Al Qaida’s core leadership in the border regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

We then started to build up Afghan forces. And we’re now in a position where we can transition out, because there’s no reason why Americans should die when Afghans are perfectly capable of defending their own country.

Now, that transition has to take place in a responsible fashion. We’ve been there a long time, and we’ve got to make sure that we and our coalition partners are pulling out responsibly and giving Afghans the capabilities that they need.

But what I think the American people recognize is after a decade of war it’s time to do some nation building here at home. And what we can now do is free up some resources, to, for example, put Americans back to work, especially our veterans, rebuilding our roads, our bridges, our schools, making sure that, you know, our veterans are getting the care that they need when it comes to post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury, making sure that the certifications that they need for good jobs of the future are in place.

OBAMA: You know, I was having lunch with some -- a veteran in Minnesota who had been a medic dealing with the most extreme circumstances. When he came home and he wanted to become a nurse, he had to start from scratch. And what we’ve said is let’s change those certifications. The first lady has done great work with an organization called Joining Forces putting our veterans back to work. And as a consequence, veterans’ unemployment is actually now lower than general population. It was higher when I came into office.

So those are the kinds of things that we can now do because we’re making that transition in Afghanistan.

SCHIEFFER: All right. Let me go to Governor Romney because you talked about Pakistan and what needs to be done there.

General Allen, our commander in Afghanistan, says that Americans continue to die at the hands of groups who are supported by Pakistan. We know that Pakistan has arrested the doctor who helped us catch Obama (sic) bin Laden. It still provides safe haven for terrorists, yet we continue to give Pakistan billions of dollars.

Is it time for us to divorce Pakistan?

ROMNEY: No, it’s not time to divorce a nation on Earth that has 100 nuclear weapons and is on the way to double that at some point, a nation that has serious threats from terrorist groups within its nation, as I indicated before, the Taliban, Haqqani Network.

It’s a nation that’s not like -- like others and it does not have a civilian leadership that is calling the shots there. You have the ISI, their intelligence organization, is probably the most powerful of the -- of three branches there. Then you have the military and then you have the civilian government.

This is a nation, which, if it falls apart, if it -- if it becomes a failed state, there are nuclear weapons there and you’ve got -- you’ve got terrorists there who could grab their -- their hands onto those nuclear weapons.

ROMNEY: This is -- this is an important part of the world for us. Pakistan is -- is technically an ally, and they’re not acting very much like an ally right now. But we have some work to do. And I -- I don’t blame the administration for the fact that the relationship with Pakistan is strained. We -- we had to go into Pakistan. We had to go in there to get Osama bin Laden. That was the right thing to do. And -- and that upset them, but obviously there was a great deal of anger even before that. But we’re going to have to work with the -- with the people in Pakistan to try and help them move to a more responsible course than the one that they’re on. And it’s important for them. It’s important for the nuclear weapons.

It’s important for the success of Afghanistan. Because inside Pakistan, you have a -- a large group of Pashtun that are -- that are Taliban. They’re going to come rushing back in to Afghanistan when we go. And that’s one of the reasons the Afghan Security Forces have so much work to do to be able to fight against that. But it’s important for us to recognize that we can’t just walk away from Pakistan. But we do need to make sure that as we -- as we send support for them, that this is tied to them making progress on -- on matters that would lead them to becoming a civil society.

SCHIEFFER: Let -- let me ask you, Governor because we know President Obama’s position on this, what is -- what is your position on the use of drones?

ROMNEY: Well I believe we should use any and all means necessary to take out people who pose a threat to us and our friends around the world. And it’s widely reported that drones are being used in drone strikes, and I support that and entirely, and feel the president was right to up the usage of that technology, and believe that we should continue to use it, to continue to go after the people that represent a threat to this nation and to our friends. But let me also note that as I said earlier, we’re going to have to do more than just going after leaders and -- and killing bad guys, important as that is.

ROMNEY: We’re also going to have to have a farm more effective and comprehensive strategy to help move the world away from terror and Islamic extremism. We haven’t done that yet. We talk a lot about these things, but you look at the -- the record, you look at the record. You look at the record of the last four years and say is Iran closer to a bomb? Yes. Is the Middle East in tumult? Yes. Is -- is al-Qaida on the run, on its heels? No. Is -- are Israel and the Palestinians closer to reaching a peace agreement?

No, they haven’t had talks in two years. We have not seen the progress we need to have, and I’m convinced that with strong leadership and an effort to build a strategy based upon helping these nations reject extremism, we can see the kind of peace and prosperity the world demands.

OBAMA: Well, keep in mind our strategy wasn’t just going after bin Laden. We created partnerships throughout the region to deal with extremism in Somalia, in Yemen, in Pakistan.

And what we’ve also done is engaged these governments in the kind of reforms that are actually going to make a difference in people’s lives day to day, to make sure that their governments aren’t corrupt, to make sure that they’re treating women with the kind of respect and dignity that every nation that succeeds has shown and to make sure that they’ve got a free market system that works.

So across the board, we are engaging them in building capacity in these countries. And we have stood on the side of democracy.

One thing I think Americans should be proud of, when Tunisians began to protest, this nation -- me, my administration -- stood with them earlier than just about any country.

In Egypt we stood on the side of democracy.

In Libya we stood on the side of the people.

And as a consequence, there’s no doubt that attitudes about Americans have changed. But there are always going to be elements in these countries that potentially threaten the United States. And we want to shrink those groups and those networks and we can do that.

OBAMA: But we’re always also going to have to maintain vigilance when it comes to terrorist activities. The truth, though, is that Al Qaeda is much weaker than it was when I came into office. And they don’t have the same capacities to attack the U.S. homeland and our allies as they did four years ago.

SCHIEFFER: Let’s -- let’s go to the next segment, because it’s a very important one. It is the rise of China and future challenges for America. I want to just begin this by asking both of you, and Mr. President, you -- you go first this time.

What do you believe is the greatest future threat to the national security of this country?

OBAMA: Well, I think it will continue to be terrorist networks. We have to remain vigilant, as I just said. But with respect to China, China is both an adversary, but also a potential partner in the international community if it’s following the rules. So my attitude coming into office was that we are going to insist that China plays by the same rules as everybody else.




Transcript of the Third Obama-Romney Presidential Debate, October 22, 2012.....Part 8 (Final)

ROMNEY: I’m pleased that I’ve balanced budgets. I was on the world of business for 25 years. If you didn’t balance your budget, you went out of business. I went into the Olympics that was out of balance, and we got it on balance, and made a success there. I had the chance to be governor of a state. Four years in a row, Democrats and Republicans came together to balance the budget. We cut taxes 19 times and balanced our budget. The president hasn’t balanced a budget yet. I expect to have the opportunity to do so myself.

SCHIEFFER: All right.

ROMNEY: I’m going to be able to balance the budget.

Let’s talk about military spending, and that’s this.

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: Thirty seconds.

ROMNEY: Our Navy is old -- excuse me, our Navy is smaller now than at any time since 1917. The Navy said they needed 313 ships to carry out their mission. We’re now at under 285. We’re headed down to the low 200s if we go through a sequestration. That’s unacceptable to me.

I want to make sure that we have the ships that are required by our Navy. Our Air Force is older and smaller than at any time since it was founded in 1947.

We’ve changed for the first time since FDR -- since FDR we had the -- we’ve always had the strategy of saying we could fight in two conflicts at once. Now we’re changing to one conflict. Look, this, in my view, is the highest responsibility of the President of the United States, which is to maintain the safety of the American people.

And I will not cut our military budget by a trillion dollars, which is a combination of the budget cuts the president has, as well as the sequestration cuts. That, in my view, is making -- is making our future less certain and less secure.

OBAMA: Bob, I just need to comment on this.

First of all, the sequester is not something that I’ve proposed. It is something that Congress has proposed. It will not happen.

The budget that we are talking about is not reducing our military spending. It is maintaining it.

But I think Governor Romney maybe hasn’t spent enough time looking at how our military works.

You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military’s changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.

OBAMA: And so the question is not a game of Battleship, where we’re counting slips. It’s what are our capabilities. And so when I sit down with the Secretary of the Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we determine how are we going to be best able to meet all of our defense needs in a way that also keeps faith with our troops, that also makes sure that our veterans have the kind of support that they need when they come home.

OBAMA: And that is not reflected in the kind of budget that you’re putting forward because it just doesn’t work.

SCHIEFFER: All right.

OBAMA: And, you know, we visited the website quite a bit and it still doesn’t work.

SCHIEFFER: A lot to cover. I’d like -- I’d like to move to the next segment: red lines, Israel and Iran.

Would either of you -- and you’ll have two minutes -- and, President Obama, you have the first go at this one -- would either of you be willing to declare that an attack on Israel is an attack on the United States, which, of course, is the same promise that we give to our close allies like Japan.

And if you made such a declaration, would not that deter Iran? It’s certainly deterred the Soviet Union for a long, long time when we made that -- we made -- we made that promise to our allies.

Mr. President?

OBAMA: First of all, Israel is a true friend. It is our greatest ally in the region. And if Israel is attacked, America will stand with Israel. I’ve made that clear throughout my presidency. And...

SCHIEFFER: So you’re -- you’re saying we’ve already made that declaration.

OBAMA: I will stand with Israel if they are attacked. And this is the reason why, working with Israel, we have created the strongest military and intelligence cooperation between our two countries in history.

In fact, this week we’ll be carrying out the largest military exercise with Israel in history, this very week. But to the issue of Iran, as long as I’m president of the United States Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. I made that clear when I came into office.

OBAMA: We then organized the strongest coalition and the strongest sanctions against Iran in history, and it is crippling their economy. Their currency has dropped 80 percent. Their oil production has plunged to the lowest level since they were fighting a war with Iraq 20 years ago. So their economy is in a shambles.

And the reason we did this is because a nuclear Iran is a threat to our national security, and it is a threat to Israel’s national security. We cannot afford to have a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region of the world.

Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. And for them to be able to provide nuclear technology to non-state actors, that’s unacceptable. And they have said that they want to see Israel wiped off the map.

So the work that we’ve done with respect to sanctions now offers Iran a choice. They can take the diplomatic route and end their nuclear program or they will have to face a united world and a United States president, me, who said we’re not going to take any options off the table.

The disagreement I have with Governor Romney is that, during the course of this campaign, he’s often talked as if we should take premature military action. I think that would be a mistake, because when I’ve sent young men and women into harm’s way, I always understand that that is the last resort, not the first resort.

SCHIEFFER: Two minutes.

ROMNEY: Well, first of all, I want to underscore the same point the president mad,e which is that if I’m President of the United States, when I’m President of the United States, we will stand with Israel.

And if Israel is attacked, we have their back, not just diplomatically, not just culturally, but militarily. That’s number one.

Number two, with regards to Iran and the threat of Iran, there’s no question but that a nuclear Iran, a nuclear-capable Iran is unacceptable to America. It presents a threat not only to our friends but ultimately a threat to us to have Iran have nuclear material, nuclear weapons that could be used against us or used to be threatening to us.

ROMNEY: It is also essential for us to understand what our mission is in Iran, and that is to dissuade Iran from having a nuclear weapon through peaceful and diplomatic means. And crippling sanctions are something I called for five years ago, when I was in Israel, speaking at the Herzliya Conference. I laid out seven steps, crippling sanctions were number one. And they do work. You’re seeing it right now in the economy. It’s absolutely the right thing to do, to have crippling sanctions. I would have put them in place earlier. But it’s good that we have them.

Number two, something I would add today is I would tighten those sanctions. I would say that ships that carry Iranian oil, can’t come into our ports. I imagine the E.U. would agree with us as well. Not only ships couldn’t, but I’d say companies that are moving their oil can’t, people who are trading in their oil can’t. I would tighten those sanctions further. Secondly, I’d take on diplomatic isolation efforts. I’d make sure that Ahmadinejad is indicted under the Genocide Convention. His words amount to genocide incitation. I would indict him for it. I would also make sure that their diplomats are treated like the pariah they are around the world. The same way we treated the apartheid diplomats of South Africa.

We need to increase pressure time, and time again on Iran because anything other than a -- a -- a solution to this, which says -- which stops this -- this nuclear folly of theirs, is unacceptable to America. And of course, a military action is the last resort. It is something one would only - only consider if all of the other avenues had been -- had been tried to their full extent.

SCHIEFFER: Let me ask both of you, there -- as you know, there are reports that Iran and the United States a part of an international group, have agreed in principle to talks about Iran’s nuclear program. What is the deal, if there are such talks? What is the deal that you would accept, Mr. President?

OBAMA: Well, first of all those are reports in the newspaper. They are not true. But our goal is to get Iran to recognize it needs to give up its nuclear program and abide by the U.N. resolutions that have been in place. Because they have the opportunity to reenter the community of nations, and we would welcome that.

There -- there are people in Iran who have the same aspirations as people all around the world for a better life. And we hope that their leadership takes the right decision, but the deal we’ll accept is they end their nuclear program. It’s very straightforward. And I’m glad that Governor Romney agrees with the steps that we’re taking. You know, there have been times, Governor, frankly, during the course of this campaign, where it sounded like you thought that you’d do the same things we did, but you’d say them louder and somehow that -- that would make a difference.

And it turns out that the work involved in setting up these crippling sanctions is painstaking. It’s meticulous. We started from the day we got into office. And the reason is was so important -- and this is a testament to how we’ve restored American credibility and strength around the world -- is we had to make sure that all the countries participated, even countries like Russia and China. Because if it’s just us that are imposing sanctions -- we’ve had sanctions in place a long time. It’s because we got everybody to agree that Iran is seeing so much pressure. And we’ve got to maintain that pressure.

There is a deal to be had, and that is that they abide by the rules that have already been established. They convince the international community they are not pursuing a nuclear program. There are inspections that are very intrusive. But over time, what they can do is regain credibility. In the meantime, though, we’re not going to let up the pressure until we have clear evidence that that takes place.

And one last thing -- just -- just to make this point. The clock is ticking. We’re not going to allow Iran to perpetually engage in negotiations that lead nowhere. And I’ve been very clear to them. You know, because of the intelligence coordination that we do with a range of countries, including Israel, we have a sense of when they would get breakout capacity, which means that we would not be able to intervene in time to stop their nuclear program.

And that clock is ticking. And we’re going to make sure that if they do not meet the demands of the international community, then we are going to take all options necessary to make sure they don’t have a nuclear weapon.

SCHIEFFER: Governor?

ROMNEY: I think from the very beginning, one of the challenges we’ve had with Iran is that they have looked at this administration, and felt that the administration was not as strong as it needed to be.

I think they saw weakness where they had expected to find American strength. And I say that because from the very beginning, the president in his campaign four years ago, said he would meet with all the world’s worst actors in his first year, he’d sit down with Chavez and Kim Jong-il, with Castro and President Ahmadinejad of Iran.

And I think they looked and thought, well, that’s an unusual honor to receive from the President of the United States. And then the president began what I have called an apology tour, of going to various nations in the Middle East and criticizing America. I think they looked at that and saw weakness.

Then when there were dissidents in the streets of Tehran, a Green Revolution, holding signs saying, is America with us, the president was silent. I think they noticed that as well.

And I think that when the president said he was going to create daylight between ourselves and Israel, that they noticed that as well.

All of these things suggested, I think, to the Iranian mullahs that, hey, you know, we can keep on pushing along here, we can keep talks going on, we’re just going to keep on spinning centrifuges.

Now there are some 10,000 centrifuges spinning uranium, preparing to create a nuclear threat to the United States and to the world. That’s unacceptable for us, and it’s essential for a president to show strength from the very beginning, to make it very clear what is acceptable and not acceptable.

And an Iranian nuclear program is not acceptable to us. They must not develop nuclear capability. And the way to make sure they understand that is by having, from the very beginning, the tightest sanctions possible. They need to be tightened. Our diplomatic isolation needs to be tougher. We need to indict Ahmadinejad. We need to put the pressure on them as hard as we possibly can, because if we do that, we won’t have to take the military action.

OBAMA: Bob, let me just respond.

Nothing Governor Romney just said is true, starting with this notion of me apologizing. This has been probably the biggest whopper that’s been told during the course of this campaign. And every fact checker and every reporter who’s looked at it, Governor, has said this is not true.

And when it comes to tightening sanctions, look, as I said before, we’ve put in the toughest, most crippling sanctions ever. And the fact is, while we were coordinating an international coalition to make sure these sanctions were effective, you were still invested in a Chinese state oil company that was doing business with the Iranian oil sector.

So I’ll let the American people decide, judge, who’s going to be more effective and more credible when it comes to imposing crippling sanctions.

And with respect to our attitude about the Iranian revolution, I was very clear about the murderous activities that had taken place and that was contrary to international law and everything that civilized people stand for.

And -- and so the strength that we have shown in Iran is shown by the fact that we’ve been able to mobilize the world.

When I came into office, the world was divided. Iran was resurgent. Iran is at its weakest point, economically, strategically, militarily, then since -- then in many years. And we are going to continue to keep the pressure on to make sure that they do not get a nuclear weapon. That’s in America’s national interest and that will be the case so long as I’m president.

ROMNEY: We’re four years closer to a nuclear Iran. We’re four years closer to a nuclear Iran. And -- and -- we should not have wasted these four years to the extent they -- they continue to be able to spin these centrifuges and get that much closer. That’s number one.

Number two, Mr. President, the reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the Middle East and you flew to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to Turkey and Iraq. And by the way, you skipped Israel, our closest friend in the region, but you went to the other nations.

And by the way, they noticed that you skipped Israel. And then in those nations, and on Arabic TV, you said that America had been dismissive and derisive. You said that on occasion America had dictated to other nations.

Mr. President, America has not dictated to other nations. We have freed other nations from dictators.

OBAMA: Bob, let me -- let me respond.

If we’re going to talk about trips that we’ve taken -- when I was a candidate for office, first trip I took was to visit our troops. And when I went to Israel as a candidate, I didn’t take donors. I didn’t attend fundraisers. I went to Yad Beshef (ph), the Holocaust museum there, to remind myself the nature of evil and why our bond with Israel will be unbreakable.

And then I went down to the border towns of Storok (ph), which had experienced missiles raining dowm from Hamas. And I saw families there who showed me there where missiles had come down near their children’s bedrooms. And I was reminded of what that would mean if those were my kids. Which is why as president, we funded an Iron Dome program to stop those missiles.

OBAMA: So that’s how I’ve used my travels, when I travel to Israel and when I travel to the region. And the -- the central question at this point is going to be: Who is going to be credible to all parties involved? And they can look at my track record, whether it’s Iran sanctions, whether it’s dealing with counterterrorism, whether it’s supporting democracy, whether it’s supporting women’s rights, whether it’s supporting religious minorities.

And they can say that the President of the United States and the United States of America has stood on the right side of history. And that kind of credibility is precisely why we’ve been able to show leadership on a wide range of issues facing the world right now.

SCHIEFFER: What if -- what if the prime minister of Israel called you on the phone and said, “Our bombers are on the way. We’re going to bomb Iran.”

What do you --

ROMNEY: Bob, let’s not go into hypotheticals of that nature. Our relationship with Israel, my relationship with the prime minister of Israel is such that we would not get a call saying our bombers are on the way, or their fighters are on the way. This is the kind of thing that would have been discussed and thoroughly evaluated well before that kind of --

(CROSSTALK)

SCHIEFFER: So you’d say it just wouldn’t happen?

That’s --

SCHIEFFER: OK. Let’s see what --

ROMNEY: But let me -- let me come back -- we can come back. Let’s come back to what the president was speaking about, which is what’s happening in the world and the president’s statement that things are going so well.

Look, I look at what’s happening around the world, and i see Iran four years closer to a bomb. I see the Middle East with a rising tide of violence, chaos, tumult. I see jihadists continuing to spread, whether they’re rising or just about the same level, hard to precisely measure, but it’s clear they’re there. They’re very strong.

I see Syria with 30,000 civilians dead, Assad still in power. I see our trade deficit with China, larger than it’s -- growing larger every year, as a matter of fact.

I look around the world and I don’t feel that you see North Korea, continuing to export their nuclear technology, Russia said they’re not going to follow Nunn-Lugar any more. They’re back away from a nuclear proliferation treaty that we had with them.

ROMNEY: I look around the world, I don’t see our influence growing around the world. I see our influence receding, in part because of the failure of the president to deal with our economic challenges at home; in part because of our withdrawal from our commitment to our military in the way I think it ought to be; in part because of the -- the -- the turmoil with Israel.

I mean, the president received a letter from 38 Democrat senators saying the tensions with Israel were a real problem. They asked him, please repair the tension -- Democrat senators -- please repair the tension...

SCHIEFFER: All right.

ROMNEY: ... the damage in his -- in his own party.

OBAMA: Governor, the problem is, is that on a whole range of issues, whether it’s the Middle East, whether it’s Afghanistan, whether it’s Iraq, whether it’s now Iran, you’ve been all over the map.

I mean, I’m -- I’m pleased that you now are endorsing our policy of applying diplomatic pressure and potentially having bilateral discussions with the Iranians to end their nuclear program. But just a few years ago you said that’s something you’d never do.

In the same way that you initially opposed a timetable in Afghanistan, now you’re for it, although it depends. In the same way that you say you would have ended the war in Iraq, but recently gave a speech saying that we should have 20,000 more folks in there. The same way that you said that it was mission creep to go after Gadhafi.

When it comes to going after Osama bin Laden, you said, well, any president would make that call. But when you were a candidate in 2008, as I was, and I said if I got bin Laden in our sights I would take that shot, you said we shouldn’t move heaven and earth to get one man.

OBAMA: And you said we should ask Pakistan for permission. And if we had asked Pakistan permission, we would not have gotten him. And it was worth moving heaven and earth to get him.

You know, after we killed bin Laden I was at ground zero for a memorial and talked to a young women who was four years old when 9/11 happened. And the last conversation she had with her father was him calling from the twin towers, saying “Peyton (ph), I love you and I will always watch over you.” And for the next decade, she was haunted by that conversation. And she said to me, “You know, by finally getting bin Laden, that brought some closure to me.”

And when we do things like that -- when we bring those who have harmed us to justice, that sends a message to the world and it tells Peyton (ph) that we did not forget her father. And I make that point because that’s the kind of clarity of leadership, and those decisions are not always popular. Those decisions generally -- generally are not poll-tested. And even some in my own party, including my current vice president, had the same critique as you did.

But what the American people understand is that I look at what we need to get done to keep the American people safe and to move our interests forward, and I make those decisions.

SCHIEFFER: All right, let’s go. And that leads us -- this takes us right to the next segment, Governor, America’s longest war, Afghanistan and Pakistan...

ROMNEY: Bob...

SCHIEFFER: Governor, you get to go first.

ROMNEY: You can’t -- but you can’t have the president just lay out a whole series of items without giving me a chance to respond.

SCHIEFFER: With respect, sir, you had laid out quite a program...

ROMNEY: Well, that’s probably true.

SCHIEFFER: We’ll give you -- we’ll catch up.

The United States is scheduled to turn over responsibility for security in Afghanistan to the Afghan government in 2014. At that point, we will withdraw our combat troops, leave a smaller force of Americans, if I understand our policy, in Afghanistan for training purposes. It seems to me the key question here is: What do you do if the deadline arrives and it is obvious the Afghans are unable to handle their security? Do we still leave?

And I believe, Governor Romney, you go first?

ROMNEY: Well, we’re going to be finished by 2014, and when I’m president, we’ll make sure we bring our troops out by the end of 2014. The commanders and the generals there are on track to do so.

We’ve seen progress over the past several years. The surge has been successful and the training program is proceeding apace. There are now a large number of Afghan Security Forces, 350,000 that are ready to step in to provide security and we’re going to be able to make that transition by the end of 2014.

So our troops will come home at that point.

I can tell you at the same time, that we will make sure that we look at what’s happening in Pakistan, and recognize that what’s happening in Pakistan is going to have a major impact on the success in Afghanistan. And I say that because I know a lot of people that feel like we should just brush our hands and walk away.

And I don’t mean you, Mr. President, but some people in the -- in our nation feel that Pakistan is being nice to us, and that we should walk away fro mthem. But Pakistan is important to the region, to the world and to us, because Pakistan has 100 nuclear warheads and they’re rushing to build a lot more. They’ll have more than Great Britain sometime in the -- in the relatively near future.

They also have the Haqqani Network and the Taliban existent within their country. And so a Pakistan that falls apart, becomes a failed state, would be of extraordinary danger to Afghanistan and to us.

And so we’re going to have to remain helpful in encouraging Pakistan to move towards a more stable government and rebuild the relationship with us. And that means that our aid that we provide to Pakistan is going to have to be conditioned upon certain benchmarks being met.

ROMNEY: So for me, I look at this as both a need to help move Pakistan in the right direction, and also to get Afghanistan to be ready, and they will be ready by the end of 2014.

SCHIEFFER: Mr. President?

OBAMA: When I came into office, we were still bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan had been drifting for a decade. We ended the war in Iraq, refocused our attention on Afghanistan, and we did deliver a surge of troops. That was facilitated in part because we had ended the war in Iraq.

And we are now in a position where we have met many of the objectives that got us there in the first place.

Part of what had happened is we’d forgotten why we had gone. We went because there were people who were responsible for 3,000 American deaths. And so we decimated Al Qaida’s core leadership in the border regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

We then started to build up Afghan forces. And we’re now in a position where we can transition out, because there’s no reason why Americans should die when Afghans are perfectly capable of defending their own country.

Now, that transition has to take place in a responsible fashion. We’ve been there a long time, and we’ve got to make sure that we and our coalition partners are pulling out responsibly and giving Afghans the capabilities that they need.

But what I think the American people recognize is after a decade of war it’s time to do some nation building here at home. And what we can now do is free up some resources, to, for example, put Americans back to work, especially our veterans, rebuilding our roads, our bridges, our schools, making sure that, you know, our veterans are getting the care that they need when it comes to post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury, making sure that the certifications that they need for good jobs of the future are in place.

OBAMA: You know, I was having lunch with some -- a veteran in Minnesota who had been a medic dealing with the most extreme circumstances. When he came home and he wanted to become a nurse, he had to start from scratch. And what we’ve said is let’s change those certifications. The first lady has done great work with an organization called Joining Forces putting our veterans back to work. And as a consequence, veterans’ unemployment is actually now lower than general population. It was higher when I came into office.

So those are the kinds of things that we can now do because we’re making that transition in Afghanistan.

SCHIEFFER: All right. Let me go to Governor Romney because you talked about Pakistan and what needs to be done there.

General Allen, our commander in Afghanistan, says that Americans continue to die at the hands of groups who are supported by Pakistan. We know that Pakistan has arrested the doctor who helped us catch Obama (sic) bin Laden. It still provides safe haven for terrorists, yet we continue to give Pakistan billions of dollars.

Is it time for us to divorce Pakistan?

ROMNEY: No, it’s not time to divorce a nation on Earth that has 100 nuclear weapons and is on the way to double that at some point, a nation that has serious threats from terrorist groups within its nation, as I indicated before, the Taliban, Haqqani Network.

It’s a nation that’s not like -- like others and it does not have a civilian leadership that is calling the shots there. You have the ISI, their intelligence organization, is probably the most powerful of the -- of three branches there. Then you have the military and then you have the civilian government.

This is a nation, which, if it falls apart, if it -- if it becomes a failed state, there are nuclear weapons there and you’ve got -- you’ve got terrorists there who could grab their -- their hands onto those nuclear weapons.

ROMNEY: This is -- this is an important part of the world for us. Pakistan is -- is technically an ally, and they’re not acting very much like an ally right now. But we have some work to do. And I -- I don’t blame the administration for the fact that the relationship with Pakistan is strained. We -- we had to go into Pakistan. We had to go in there to get Osama bin Laden. That was the right thing to do. And -- and that upset them, but obviously there was a great deal of anger even before that. But we’re going to have to work with the -- with the people in Pakistan to try and help them move to a more responsible course than the one that they’re on. And it’s important for them. It’s important for the nuclear weapons.

It’s important for the success of Afghanistan. Because inside Pakistan, you have a -- a large group of Pashtun that are -- that are Taliban. They’re going to come rushing back in to Afghanistan when we go. And that’s one of the reasons the Afghan Security Forces have so much work to do to be able to fight against that. But it’s important for us to recognize that we can’t just walk away from Pakistan. But we do need to make sure that as we -- as we send support for them, that this is tied to them making progress on -- on matters that would lead them to becoming a civil society.

SCHIEFFER: Let -- let me ask you, Governor because we know President Obama’s position on this, what is -- what is your position on the use of drones?

ROMNEY: Well I believe we should use any and all means necessary to take out people who pose a threat to us and our friends around the world. And it’s widely reported that drones are being used in drone strikes, and I support that and entirely, and feel the president was right to up the usage of that technology, and believe that we should continue to use it, to continue to go after the people that represent a threat to this nation and to our friends. But let me also note that as I said earlier, we’re going to have to do more than just going after leaders and -- and killing bad guys, important as that is.

ROMNEY: We’re also going to have to have a farm more effective and comprehensive strategy to help move the world away from terror and Islamic extremism. We haven’t done that yet. We talk a lot about these things, but you look at the -- the record, you look at the record. You look at the record of the last four years and say is Iran closer to a bomb? Yes. Is the Middle East in tumult? Yes. Is -- is al-Qaida on the run, on its heels? No. Is -- are Israel and the Palestinians closer to reaching a peace agreement?

No, they haven’t had talks in two years. We have not seen the progress we need to have, and I’m convinced that with strong leadership and an effort to build a strategy based upon helping these nations reject extremism, we can see the kind of peace and prosperity the world demands.

OBAMA: Well, keep in mind our strategy wasn’t just going after bin Laden. We created partnerships throughout the region to deal with extremism in Somalia, in Yemen, in Pakistan.

And what we’ve also done is engaged these governments in the kind of reforms that are actually going to make a difference in people’s lives day to day, to make sure that their governments aren’t corrupt, to make sure that they’re treating women with the kind of respect and dignity that every nation that succeeds has shown and to make sure that they’ve got a free market system that works.

So across the board, we are engaging them in building capacity in these countries. And we have stood on the side of democracy.

One thing I think Americans should be proud of, when Tunisians began to protest, this nation -- me, my administration -- stood with them earlier than just about any country.

In Egypt we stood on the side of democracy.

In Libya we stood on the side of the people.

And as a consequence, there’s no doubt that attitudes about Americans have changed. But there are always going to be elements in these countries that potentially threaten the United States. And we want to shrink those groups and those networks and we can do that.

OBAMA: But we’re always also going to have to maintain vigilance when it comes to terrorist activities. The truth, though, is that Al Qaeda is much weaker than it was when I came into office. And they don’t have the same capacities to attack the U.S. homeland and our allies as they did four years ago.

SCHIEFFER: Let’s -- let’s go to the next segment, because it’s a very important one. It is the rise of China and future challenges for America. I want to just begin this by asking both of you, and Mr. President, you -- you go first this time.

What do you believe is the greatest future threat to the national security of this country?

OBAMA: Well, I think it will continue to be terrorist networks. We have to remain vigilant, as I just said. But with respect to China, China is both an adversary, but also a potential partner in the international community if it’s following the rules. So my attitude coming into office was that we are going to insist that China plays by the same rules as everybody else.